Kikkoman Corporation (2801.TSE) - Investment Analysis
Analysis Date: December 28, 2025 Current Price: JPY 1,441 (post-split, as of Dec 2025) ADR Price (KIKOY): USD 17.92
Executive Summary
Investment Thesis (3 Sentences)
Kikkoman is the world's dominant naturally brewed soy sauce manufacturer, with a 400-year heritage and 50 consecutive years of overseas volume growth at a 7.1% CAGR. The company has achieved the rare feat of globalizing Japanese culinary culture, now earning 89% of operating profits from overseas operations (primarily North America), while maintaining fortress-like financials with a 12.2% D/E ratio and 74.8% equity ratio. However, at a current P/E of 22x and trading 30%+ above conservative intrinsic value, patient investors should wait for market dislocations to acquire this exceptional compounder at a margin of safety.
Key Metrics Dashboard
| Metric | FY2025 Value | 5Y Trend | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | JPY 709.0B | +10% CAGR | Accelerating |
| Operating Margin | 10.4% | +1.4pp | Expanding |
| Net Margin | 8.7% | +1.6pp | Excellent |
| ROE | 12.3% | +2.3pp | Above Buffett threshold |
| ROIC | 11.1% | +2.4pp | 4% above WACC |
| D/E Ratio | 12.2% | -4.7pp | Fortress |
| Equity Ratio | 74.8% | +4.5pp | Exceptional |
| Dividend Yield | 1.7% | Stable | Growing payout |
| Payout Ratio | 38.5% | +8.4pp | Sustainable |
| FCF | JPY 33.4B | +108% | Cash machine |
| P/E Ratio | 22.2x | -11x | Still premium |
Verdict: WAIT
Reason: World-class franchise at fair value. Wait for 20-30% pullback for margin of safety.
PHASE 1: RISK ANALYSIS (Inversion Thinking)
"All I want to know is where I'm going to die, so I'll never go there." - Charlie Munger
1.1 Technological Disruption Risk: VERY LOW
Assessment: Near-zero disruption risk. Naturally brewed soy sauce requires 6-month fermentation using proprietary koji cultures perfected over centuries.
- Threat: Lab-grown or synthetic soy sauce substitutes
- Probability: <3% within 15 years
- Impact if Occurs: Moderate (20-30% revenue hit)
- Expected Loss: 0.03 x 25% = 0.75%
Annual Report Evidence:
- Kikkoman's fermentation and brewing technology is explicitly highlighted as a core competency in Global Vision 2030
- The company invests consistently in R&D (JPY 5.4B in FY2025), but focuses on product extensions rather than defensive technology
- Unlike plant-based meat disrupting animal protein, soy sauce IS the plant-based product - no disruption vector exists
1.2 Regulatory/Legal Risk: LOW
Assessment: Minimal regulatory exposure. Food safety and labeling regulations are stable.
- Threat: Tariffs, trade restrictions, or new labeling requirements
- Probability: 15% in any given year
- Impact if Occurs: Modest (5-10% margin compression)
- Expected Loss: 0.15 x 7.5% = 1.1%
Mitigating Factors (from Annual Reports):
- Local production in US (Walworth, Folsom, and new Jefferson plant) insulates from import tariffs
- 8 global production facilities provide geographic diversification
- Clean regulatory track record - no recalls or safety incidents disclosed
1.3 Competitive Dynamics Risk: LOW
Assessment: Extraordinarily stable competitive position. US market share of 57-60% maintained for 10 consecutive years despite Chinese competitor entry.
Market Share Trends (From Factbook 2024):
| Year | Kikkoman US Share | Japan Share (w/ Higeta) |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 55.7% | 32.7% |
| 2019 | 57.4% | 33.6% |
| 2023 | 57.6% | 33.6% |
| 2024 | 57.6% | 33.6% |
Competitive Dynamics:
- La Choy (ConAgra): ~15% US share, declining and stagnant
- Lee Kum Kee: Growing in Asia-Pacific, minimal US traction
- Private Label: ~10%, limited to price-sensitive consumers
- Japanese regional brewers: Consolidating (1,055 breweries in 2022, down from 1,400+)
Moat Evidence: Premium price sustained at 30-50% above private label. Switching costs embedded in restaurant recipes and consumer habits.
1.4 Financial/Operational Risk: MINIMAL
Assessment: Fortress balance sheet eliminates financial distress risk entirely.
Balance Sheet Strength (FY2025):
Total Assets: JPY 679.4B
Total Equity: JPY 516.0B
Equity Ratio: 74.8%
Interest-Bearing Debt: JPY 62.2B
D/E Ratio: 12.2%
Cash & Equivalents: JPY 106.2B
Net Cash Position: JPY 44.0B (net cash after debt)
Stress Test: Even with a hypothetical 50% revenue decline, Kikkoman could operate 5+ years on cash reserves. The company has zero refinancing risk - JPY 14.4B in long-term borrowings vs. JPY 106B cash.
1.5 Currency Risk: MODERATE
Assessment: Yen appreciation poses the most significant near-term earnings risk.
- 75% of profits from overseas = significant translation exposure
- Current rate (JPY 152/USD) is historically weak, flattering earnings
- Strong Yen (JPY 100/USD) scenario: Would reduce translated profits by ~35%
Natural Hedge: US production costs partially offset US revenue exposure. Factbook shows ~70% of overseas capital expenditure in North America.
1.6 Management/Governance Risk: LOW
Assessment: Conservative, family-influenced management with excellent capital allocation track record.
Governance Structure (from Factbook 2024):
- 12 Directors (5 outside directors)
- 4 Audit & Supervisory Board Members (2 outside)
- Nominating Committee: 8 members (5 outside directors) - chaired by outside director
- Remuneration Committee: 8 members (5 outside directors) - chaired by outside director
Capital Allocation Excellence:
- Exited non-core businesses: Sold Country Life and Allergy Research Group (2023)
- Divested Coca-Cola business (2009)
- Sold shochu business (2006)
- Ended Riken Vitamin stake (2024)
- Focus on core soy sauce and wholesale - no empire building
1.7 Japan Market Decline Risk: MODERATE-HIGH
Assessment: Structural decline in Japanese soy sauce consumption is real but offset by overseas growth.
Evidence from Annual Reports:
- Japan soy sauce shipment volume: 683 thousand KL (2023), down from 800+ thousand KL (2014)
- Household expenditure shifting from soy sauce to tsuyu/tare (sauce concentrates)
- Kikkoman mitigating through:
- Smaller packaging (less than 1L now 22% of sales vs. 17% in 2015)
- Soy sauce derivative products (tsuyu, tare)
- Soy milk business (#1 in Japan with 45-52% share)
Strategic Response: Japan Foods Manufacturing margin compressed to 5.5% vs. Overseas 23.8%. Company explicitly focuses on overseas as growth engine.
INVERSION: How Could This Investment Fail?
Permanent 50%+ Loss Scenario:
- Prolonged Yen appreciation to sub-100 levels PLUS
- Chinese brand breakthrough in premium US market PLUS
- Major quality scandal (contamination/recall)
- Probability: <2% (requires multiple simultaneous failures)
Non-Price Sell Triggers:
- US market share drops below 50%
- ROIC falls below WACC (7.1%) for 3 consecutive years
- Debt-financed acquisition destroying capital discipline
- Loss of founding family influence leading to short-termism
Risk Summary
| Risk Category | Probability | Impact | Expected Loss | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | 3% | 25% | 0.75% | Very Low |
| Regulatory | 15% | 7.5% | 1.1% | Low |
| Competition | 5% | 15% | 0.75% | Low |
| Financial | <1% | 50% | <0.5% | Minimal |
| Currency | 35% | 15% | 5.3% | Moderate |
| Management | 3% | 20% | 0.6% | Low |
| Japan Decline | 70% | 8% | 5.6% | Priced In |
Total Expected Annual Risk-Adjusted Loss: ~14.5% Quality Score: 88/100 (Exceptional business with limited risks)
PHASE 2: FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
2.1 Historical Performance (6-Year IFRS Summary)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue (B) | Bus. Profit (B) | Net Income (B) | ROE (%) | ROIC (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY3/2020 | 439.6 | 38.0 | 26.8 | 10.0 | 8.7 |
| FY3/2021 | 439.4 | 42.7 | 31.2 | 10.7 | 9.5 |
| FY3/2022 | 516.4 | 52.3 | 38.9 | 11.7 | 10.4 |
| FY3/2023 | 618.9 | 58.8 | 43.7 | 11.4 | 10.2 |
| FY3/2024 | 660.8 | 73.4 | 56.4 | 12.5 | 11.2 |
| FY3/2025 | 709.0 | 77.3 | 61.7 | 12.3 | 11.1 |
Observations:
- Revenue CAGR (5Y): 10.0%
- Net Income CAGR (5Y): 18.1% (margin expansion)
- ROE improved from 10.0% to 12.3% (operating leverage, not financial)
- ROIC consistently exceeds WACC by 4%+ (value creation confirmed)
2.2 Segment Performance Deep Dive
FY2025 Segment Breakdown:
| Segment | Revenue (B) | Bus. Profit (B) | Margin | % of Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Japan Foods Mfg | 154.3 | 8.5 | 5.5% | 11% |
| Japan Others | 21.6 | 1.2 | 5.4% | 2% |
| Overseas Foods Mfg | 167.2 | 39.9 | 23.8% | 52% |
| Overseas Wholesale | 407.5 | 30.4 | 7.5% | 39% |
| Holding Company | 62.7 | 46.5 | 74.1% | N/A |
| Eliminations | (92.0) | (49.1) | - | - |
| Consolidated | 709.0 | 77.3 | 10.9% | 100% |
Key Insight: Overseas operations generate 91% of business profit at dramatically higher margins. The Japan business is mature but stable - the real value is in global soy sauce expansion.
2.3 Overseas Soy Sauce - The Crown Jewel
50-Year Growth Track Record (from Factbook 2024):
- FY1974-FY2024 Volume CAGR: 7.1% (indexed to 2,946 vs. 100 in 1974)
- This is remarkable consistency across 5 decades
Regional Breakdown (FY2024):
| Region | % of Overseas Sales | 9Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|
| North America | 65% | 6.4% |
| Europe | 19% | 9.9% |
| Asia & Oceania | 14% | 10.0% |
| Others | 2% | - |
US Channel Mix (evolution showing premiumization):
| Channel | FY2015 | FY2024 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home-use | 41% | 40% | Stable |
| Foodservice | 47% | 45% | Stable |
| Industrial | 12% | 15% | Growing |
Industrial use (food manufacturing) growth indicates penetration into mainstream American food production.
2.4 Balance Sheet Fortress
Financial Position (FY2025):
| Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Total Assets | JPY 679.4B | Growing steadily |
| Total Equity | JPY 516.0B | 74.8% of assets |
| Cash & Equivalents | JPY 106.2B | Record high |
| Interest-Bearing Debt | JPY 62.2B | Minimal |
| Net Debt | (JPY 44.0B) | Net cash! |
| Working Capital | JPY 246.8B | Comfortable |
Liability Structure:
- Long-term Borrowings: JPY 14.4B
- Lease Liabilities: JPY 40.8B
- No bonds outstanding
- Pension obligations well-funded (JPY 16.1B asset vs. JPY 3.5B liability)
2.5 Cash Flow Analysis
Owner Earnings Calculation (FY2025):
Net Income: JPY 61.7B
+ Depreciation & Amortization: JPY 26.9B
- Maintenance CapEx (est. 75%): JPY 35.1B
- Working Capital Increase: JPY 5.0B
= Owner Earnings: JPY 48.5B
Owner Earnings per Share: JPY 51.5 (post-split)
Cash Flow Trends (IFRS):
| Year | OCF (B) | CapEx (B) | FCF (B) | FCF Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2020 | 42.0 | 29.1 | 16.1 | 1.2% |
| FY2021 | 57.2 | 20.9 | 40.4 | 3.0% |
| FY2022 | 52.1 | 24.6 | 32.7 | 2.4% |
| FY2023 | 59.2 | 38.2 | 32.8 | 2.4% |
| FY2024 | 80.8 | 43.5 | 49.8 | 3.7% |
| FY2025 | 74.0 | 46.8 | 33.4 | 2.5% |
FY2025 CapEx Note: Elevated due to Jefferson, Wisconsin plant construction. Expected to normalize post-2026.
2.6 Valuation Analysis
A. Graham Number (Defensive Floor)
Graham Number = sqrt(22.5 x EPS x BVPS)
= sqrt(22.5 x 65 x 540)
= sqrt(789,750)
= JPY 889
Current Price: JPY 1,441 vs. Graham Number: 62% PREMIUM
B. DCF Valuation (Conservative)
Assumptions:
- FCF Base: JPY 35B (normalized)
- Growth Years 1-5: 5%
- Growth Years 6-10: 3%
- Terminal Growth: 2%
- Discount Rate (WACC): 7.5%
Years 1-10 PV: JPY 280B
Terminal Value PV: JPY 380B
Total Enterprise: JPY 660B
Less: Net Debt: (JPY 44B) - net cash position
Equity Value: JPY 704B
Per Share: JPY 747
Conservative DCF Value: JPY 747 (48% below current price)
C. Owner Earnings Multiple
| Multiple | Implied Value/Share |
|---|---|
| 12x (Conservative) | JPY 618 |
| 15x (Fair for quality) | JPY 773 |
| 18x (Premium quality) | JPY 927 |
| 22x (Current) | JPY 1,133 |
| 28x (Peak 2021) | JPY 1,442 |
Current valuation of 28x owner earnings approaches 2021 peak levels.
D. Relative Valuation
| Peer | P/E | EV/EBITDA | ROE | Dividend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kikkoman | 22.2x | 13x | 12.3% | 1.7% |
| Ajinomoto (2802.T) | 25x | 12x | 10.2% | 1.8% |
| McCormick (MKC.US) | 26x | 17x | 14.1% | 2.1% |
| Nestle (NESN.SW) | 18x | 14x | 22.0% | 3.3% |
| Heinz-Kraft (KHC.US) | 15x | 11x | 4.5% | 4.8% |
Kikkoman trades at a discount to McCormick (closest peer) but premium to diversified food conglomerates. Multiple is justified by growth and returns.
2.7 Valuation Summary
| Method | Value/Share (JPY) | vs. Current Price |
|---|---|---|
| Graham Number | 889 | -38% (overvalued) |
| DCF (Conservative) | 747 | -48% (overvalued) |
| Owner Earnings 15x | 773 | -46% (overvalued) |
| Owner Earnings 20x | 1,030 | -29% (overvalued) |
| Peer-Relative | 1,300-1,500 | Fair value range |
Weighted Intrinsic Value: JPY 950-1,100 Current Margin of Safety: NEGATIVE 30-50%
PHASE 3: MOAT ANALYSIS
3.1 Moat Sources Identified
| Moat Type | Strength | Duration | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | EXCEPTIONAL | 50+ years | 400-year heritage, global #1 |
| Switching Costs | STRONG | 20+ years | Recipe lock-in, industrial |
| Cost Advantage | MODERATE | 15+ years | Scale economics |
| Intangible Assets | STRONG | Indefinite | Proprietary koji cultures |
| Network Effects | WEAK | N/A | Limited applicability |
3.2 Brand Moat - Deep Analysis
Heritage & Authenticity:
- Founded 1917 (merger of 8 families brewing since 1600s)
- "Naturally brewed" positioning commands premium
- Iconic red-top dispenser bottle (patented design)
- Cultural association with Japanese cuisine globally
Brand Power Evidence:
- Price Premium: 30-50% above private label sustained for decades
- Market Share Stability: 57-60% US share for 10 years
- Penetration Depth: #1 in 100+ countries
- Consumer Recognition: Synonymous with soy sauce globally
Brand Value Quantification:
- Excess profit from brand premium: ~JPY 25-30B annually
- Capitalized at 15x: ~JPY 400B brand asset
- This represents ~30% of current market cap - substantial but not excessive
3.3 Switching Costs - Industrial & Foodservice
Industrial Customers (15% of US sales, growing):
- Food manufacturers formulate around Kikkoman flavor profile
- Reformulation requires R&D investment and regulatory re-approval
- Quality consistency critical for mass production
- Switching Cost: 3-5x annual spend
Foodservice (45% of US sales):
- Restaurant chains train staff on Kikkoman products
- Menu development built around specific flavor profiles
- Brand recognition on table = customer expectation
- Switching Cost: 2-3x annual spend
Retail Consumers (40%):
- Lower switching costs but brand loyalty high
- Multi-generational usage patterns
- Switching Cost: 0.3x annual spend
3.4 Proprietary Fermentation Technology
Intangible Asset Moat:
- Kikkoman maintains proprietary koji cultures developed over centuries
- 6-month natural brewing process cannot be economically replicated
- R&D investment (JPY 5.4B/year) focused on fermentation science
- Patents on production processes and dispensing systems
From Annual Reports:
- "Fermentation and brewing technologies" listed as core management resource in Global Vision 2030
- Company operates largest naturally brewed soy sauce facilities in the world
3.5 Scale Economics
Manufacturing Efficiency:
- 8 global production facilities
- Walworth, WI: Largest soy sauce plant outside Asia
- Folsom, CA: West Coast supply hub
- Jefferson, WI: Under construction (capacity expansion)
Distribution Network:
- JFC International: Wholesale subsidiary with 20+ global locations
- Integrated logistics from farm to table
- Scale advantage estimated at 5-8% cost benefit vs. smaller competitors
3.6 Moat Durability Assessment
Forces Reinforcing Moat:
- Growing global adoption of Asian cuisine
- Premiumization trend in food ingredients
- Industrial penetration creating embedded switching costs
- Japanese cuisine gaining UNESCO cultural heritage status
Forces Eroding Moat:
- Chinese premium brand emergence (Lee Kum Kee)
- Private label growth in price-sensitive segments
- Declining Japan domestic consumption
- Potential future synthetic alternatives
10-Year Moat Trajectory: STABLE TO WIDENING
The overseas moat is widening as cultural adoption deepens. Japan moat is narrowing but irrelevant to overall value (11% of profits).
3.7 Moat Score: 85/100 (Wide and Durable)
PHASE 4: DECISION SYNTHESIS
4.1 Opportunity Analysis
Why Might This Be Mispriced?
Actually, Kikkoman is NOT mispriced. The market correctly recognizes:
- Exceptional business quality
- Consistent growth track record
- Fortress balance sheet
- Reasonable management
This is a wonderful company at a fair-to-premium price, not a value opportunity.
When Could It Become Mispriced?
- General market correction (Japan market selloff)
- Yen strength causing earnings translation decline
- Short-term competitive scare (Chinese brand press coverage)
- Rotation out of defensive stocks in risk-on environments
4.2 Catalyst Analysis
| Catalyst | Timeline | Probability | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jefferson plant completion | 2025-2026 | 95% | +5-8% revenue capacity |
| India market entry | 3-5 years | 40% | +10% TAM long-term |
| China premium growth | Ongoing | 60% | +15% overseas revenue |
| Yen depreciation continuation | Variable | 40% | Earnings translation boost |
| Dividend increase | Annual | 85% | 5-8% dividend growth |
| Market correction | Unknown | 30% in any year | Buy opportunity |
Near-Term Assessment: No compelling catalyst for re-rating. Stock is priced for continued execution.
4.3 Position Sizing Framework
Base Allocation (quality company): 3%
Adjustment Factors:
x Margin of Safety: (-30%) / 30% target = 0 (no MOS)
x Quality Score: 88/100 = 0.88
x Risk Score: (1 - 0.145) = 0.86
x Catalyst Multiplier: 0.6 (no near-term catalyst)
Position Size = 3% x 0 x 0.88 x 0.86 x 0.6 = 0%
Recommended Current Position: 0% (Wait for margin of safety)
4.4 Expected Return Analysis
| Scenario | Probability | 5-Year Return | Weighted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bull (PE to 28x, 10% EPS growth) | 15% | +65% | +9.8% |
| Base (PE stable, 8% EPS growth) | 45% | +47% | +21.2% |
| Bear (PE to 18x, 5% EPS growth) | 30% | -8% | -2.4% |
| Disaster (Yen spike, share loss) | 10% | -35% | -3.5% |
| Expected 5-Year Return | 100% | +25.1% |
Annualized Expected Return: 4.6% (Below 10%+ hurdle rate)
4.5 Entry Price Levels
Based on Intrinsic Value range of JPY 950-1,100:
| Level | Price (JPY) | P/E | Condition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Strong Buy | <700 | 10.8x | 30%+ MOS (crisis only) |
| Buy | <800 | 12.3x | 20%+ MOS |
| Accumulate | <900 | 13.8x | 10% MOS |
| Hold | 900-1,200 | 13.8-18.5x | Fair value range |
| Trim | >1,200 | >18.5x | Overvalued |
| Sell | >1,500 | >23.1x | Significantly overvalued |
Current Price (1,441): WAIT zone - 20%+ above fair value midpoint
4.6 Monitoring Metrics
| Metric | Current | Yellow Flag | Red Flag |
|---|---|---|---|
| US Market Share | 57.6% | <55% | <50% |
| ROIC | 11.1% | <9% | <7% (below WACC) |
| ROE | 12.3% | <10% | <8% |
| Overseas Rev. Growth | +8.5% | <3% | <0% |
| D/E Ratio | 12.2% | >30% | >50% |
| Dividend Payout | 38.5% | >60% | >80% |
| Operating Margin | 10.4% | <8% | <6% |
FINAL RECOMMENDATION
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| INVESTMENT RECOMMENDATION |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Company: Kikkoman Corporation Ticker: 2801.TSE / KIKOY |
| Current Price: JPY 1,441 Date: December 28, 2025 |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| VALUATION SUMMARY |
| +---------------------------+-----------+-----------------------+ |
| | Method | Value/Shr | vs Current Price | |
| +---------------------------+-----------+-----------------------+ |
| | Graham Number | JPY 889 | -38% (overvalued) | |
| | DCF (Conservative) | JPY 747 | -48% (overvalued) | |
| | Owner Earnings (15x) | JPY 773 | -46% (overvalued) | |
| | Owner Earnings (20x) | JPY 1,030 | -29% (overvalued) | |
| | Peer Relative | JPY 1,400 | -3% (fair) | |
| +---------------------------+-----------+-----------------------+ |
| |
| INTRINSIC VALUE ESTIMATE: JPY 950-1,100 (weighted average) |
| MARGIN OF SAFETY: -31% to -51% (NEGATIVE) |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| RECOMMENDATION: [ ] BUY [ ] HOLD [ ] SELL [X] WAIT |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| STRONG BUY PRICE: JPY 700 (30% below IV midpoint) |
| BUY PRICE: JPY 800 (20% below IV) |
| ACCUMULATE PRICE: JPY 900 (10% below IV) |
| FAIR VALUE: JPY 1,025 (IV midpoint) |
| TRIM PRICE: JPY 1,200 (15% above IV) |
| SELL PRICE: JPY 1,500 (45% above IV) |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| POSITION SIZE: 0% (Wait for correction) |
| CATALYST: Jefferson plant completion, market correction |
| PRIMARY RISK: Yen appreciation, Japan market decline |
| SELL TRIGGER: US share <50%, ROIC <7%, quality scandal |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
Why WAIT?
- Quality is undisputed: Kikkoman is a truly wonderful business with a wide, durable moat
- Valuation offers no margin of safety: Trading 30-50% above conservative IV
- Expected returns below hurdle: 4.6% annualized doesn't compensate for risks
- Patience required: Exceptional companies occasionally trade at bargain prices
What Would Change This Recommendation?
- 20% correction to JPY 1,150: Begin small position (1-2%)
- 30% correction to JPY 1,000: Meaningful position (3-4%)
- 40%+ correction to JPY 850: Full position (5%+)
- 50%+ correction to JPY 700: Back up the truck (6%+)
Historical precedent: COVID crash (March 2020) saw Kikkoman drop to JPY 921 (split-adjusted). That was a generational buying opportunity.
SOURCES USED
Primary Documents (Downloaded to /research/analyses/2801/data/)
- Corporate Report 2024 (13.1 MB)
- Corporate Report 2023 (14.8 MB)
- Corporate Report 2022 (12.4 MB)
- Corporate Report 2021 (4.1 MB)
- Corporate Report 2020 (12.0 MB)
- Factbook 2025 Financial Data (0.8 MB) - Key financial tables extracted
- Factbook 2024 Business Information (3.5 MB) - Market share data extracted
Financial Data Sources
- EODHD MCP: ADR pricing (KIKOY.US)
- Extracted CSV tables from Factbooks (31 years of data)
Key Data Points Verified from Annual Reports
- 50-year overseas soy sauce volume CAGR: 7.1%
- US market share stability: 57-60% for 10 years
- ROE improvement from 8.7% (2016) to 12.3% (2025)
- Jefferson, Wisconsin plant construction status
Appendix: Psychology Check
| Bias | Check | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Incentive-caused | No compensation tied to recommendation | Clean |
| Social proof | Not following gurus or consensus | Clean |
| Liking tendency | Affinity for Japanese products possible | Minor concern |
| Commitment | First-time analysis, no prior position | Clean |
| Availability | Not driven by recent news | Clean |
| Authority | Independent analysis | Clean |
Final Munger Test:
- Can I explain in one sentence? YES - "Kikkoman makes soy sauce and has spread Japanese cuisine globally for 50 years"
- What do I believe the market doesn't? NOTHING - Market correctly prices quality
- If down 50%, excited or panicked? EXCITED - Would buy aggressively
Analysis completed December 28, 2025 Kikkoman remains on watchlist pending 20%+ price correction