Back to Portfolio
A04

ASL Marine Holdings

$0.335 0.3B market cap February 2026
ASL Marine Holdings A04 BUFFETT / MUNGER / KLARMAN SUMMARY
1 SNAPSHOT
Price$0.335
Market Cap0.3B
2 BUSINESS

ASL Marine is a turnaround story in a fundamentally poor business. The company operates in the commodity marine services industry with no durable competitive advantage, earns paper-thin margins even at cyclical peaks, carries dangerous leverage, and has destroyed shareholder value over its listed history. The Ang family controls the company with weak governance and minimal capital returns to minority shareholders. While the stock has risen 500%+ from its lows on the turnaround narrative, the underlying business economics do not justify investment at any price - this is a value trap dressed as a turnaround. Buffett would never own this type of business.

3 MOAT None

No meaningful moat. Commodity shipbuilding/repair. Batam cost advantage is shared. Vertical integration provides operational synergy but no defensible advantage.

4 MANAGEMENT
CEO: Ang Kok Tian

Poor - accumulated excessive debt in boom, destroyed book value, diluted shareholders. Current deleveraging is belated correction.

5 ECONOMICS
5.4% Op Margin
14% ROIC
13.1% ROE
11x P/E
0.015B FCF
132% Debt/EBITDA
6 VALUATION
FCF Yield4.3%
DCF Range0.08 - 0.2

Overvalued by 55% - S$0.335 vs average fair value S$0.15. Stock up 500%+ from lows pricing in cyclical peak.

7 MUNGER INVERSION
Kill Event Severity P() E[Loss]
Cyclical downturn would immediately wipe out thin profits and return to value destruction - FY2021-22 saw S$67M cumulative losses HIGH - -
1.32x net gearing amplifies downside - S$21M finance costs vs S$15M net profit MED - -
8 KLARMAN LENS
Downside Case

Cyclical downturn would immediately wipe out thin profits and return to value destruction - FY2021-22 saw S$67M cumulative losses

Why Market Right

Global trade slowdown from tariffs/geopolitical tensions; Interest rate increases would pressure S$179M floating-rate debt; Shipping overcapacity cycle returning; Further share dilution (50% share issuance mandate)

Catalysts

Continued deleveraging if vessel disposals proceed as planned; Asia infrastructure boom could extend cycle; Marine decarbonization/recycling could create new revenue streams

9 VERDICT REJECT
C Quality Weak - 1.32x net gearing, S$179M borrowings on S$112M equity. Finance costs consume most of net profit. First dividend in years at token 0.2 cents.
Fair Value$0.2

Do not invest. No quality characteristics, no moat, peak-cycle pricing.

🧠 ULTRATHINK Deep Philosophical Analysis

ASL Marine Holdings: An Ultrathink

The Core Question

Is ASL Marine Holdings a misunderstood turnaround that the market has finally recognized, or is it a fundamentally poor business enjoying a cyclical reprieve before the next inevitable downturn?

The answer lies not in the recent profit figures -- which are genuinely impressive in their trajectory from S$67 million in cumulative losses to S$14.7 million in profit -- but in the deeper question of what kind of business this is and whether it can sustain attractive returns on capital through a full cycle. The evidence overwhelmingly points to the latter interpretation: a cyclical business at peak earnings that has never demonstrated the ability to compound shareholder wealth.

Hidden Assumptions

The bull case for ASL Marine rests on several hidden assumptions that deserve scrutiny.

First, it assumes the marine cycle has structurally shifted and that margins will remain elevated. The evidence is against this. Marine services has been cyclical for centuries, and the current margin expansion from negative to 17% gross margin is perfectly consistent with a cyclical recovery, not a structural transformation.

Second, it assumes the deleveraging will continue without dilution. But the company placed shares at S$0.1703 in October 2025 even as the stock traded significantly higher. The share count has already grown from 630 million to over a billion. Future capital needs could lead to further dilution.

Third, there is an implicit assumption that the Ang family's interests align with minority shareholders. With 70% control, weak governance, and minimal dividend payouts, the evidence suggests otherwise. The family derives value from control, employment, and related-party transactions that may not flow through to the share price.

Contrarian View

The honest contrarian argument for ASL Marine would emphasize: (a) the company has survived a near-death experience and management has learned hard lessons about leverage and capital discipline; (b) Asian infrastructure spending, particularly in Indonesia and ASEAN, could create a super-cycle in marine demand lasting 10+ years; (c) the fleet optimization program is rationalizing the asset base; and (d) the company trades at just 11x earnings with genuine operating cash flow.

These are real points. But they describe a cyclical recovery trade, not a value investment. The contrarian buyer here is making a bet on cycle timing, not on business quality. When the smartest investors in the world -- Buffett, Munger, Klarman -- have all warned repeatedly about the dangers of investing in capital-intensive, cyclical businesses without moats, ignoring their wisdom requires more than a good narrative.

Moat Meditation

In Buffett's framework, the first question is always: does this business have a moat? For ASL Marine, the answer is unambiguously no.

Consider what ASL Marine actually sells. It builds vessels to standardized designs. It repairs ships that could be repaired at dozens of competing yards across Southeast Asia. It charters vessels in a market with transparent pricing. None of these activities generate pricing power or customer lock-in.

The vertical integration story -- that combining shipbuilding, repair, and chartering under one roof creates unique value -- is a narrative that sounds compelling in a PowerPoint presentation but fails the Munger test of "what would happen if a competent competitor decided to replicate this?" The answer is: nothing would stop them, and many already have. Indonesia alone has scores of shipyards. Singapore has Keppel, Sembcorp, and others with far greater scale and technological capability.

The Batam shipyard provides access to lower-cost Indonesian labor, but this is a shared advantage among all Indonesian operations. It is not a moat; it is a cost of doing business in the region.

The truest test of whether a moat exists is the company's own financial record. Businesses with genuine competitive advantages do not swing from negative gross margins to 17% and back again. They do not see their book value per share decline from 15.57 cents to 11.29 cents over five years. They do not require warrant issuances and share placements to stay afloat. The volatility of ASL Marine's results is itself proof that no moat exists.

The Owner's Mindset

Would Buffett own this business for twenty years? The question almost answers itself.

Buffett has been explicit about what he looks for: businesses with durable competitive advantages, consistent returns on equity above 15%, light capital requirements, and honest, able management. ASL Marine fails on every count.

The return on equity is deeply negative over a full cycle. The business consumed S$31 million in capital expenditure in FY2025 alone -- and that was a "good" year. The fleet requires constant renewal, the shipyards require ongoing maintenance, and vessels depreciate relentlessly. This is a business that eats capital for breakfast.

What about the Ang family's commitment? They own 70% and have been in the business for 50 years. This is genuine skin in the game. But skin in the game is necessary but not sufficient. The Ang family has presided over a period that destroyed roughly S$67 million in shareholder value in just two years, diluted shareholders through warrant conversions, and has now paid out a token dividend of 0.2 cents per share -- the first dividend in years. For a family that controls 70% of the company, the distinction between managing the business as a family enterprise (employment, prestige, control) and managing it for shareholder returns is critical. The evidence suggests the former.

The governance structure confirms this concern. Ang Kok Tian is simultaneously Chairman, Managing Director, and CEO. Three of six board members are family. Independent directors have minimal real power. This is the kind of governance structure that Munger warns about: one where the interests of controlling shareholders may diverge from those of minorities.

Risk Inversion

What could destroy this business? The more honest question is: what has already destroyed it, and could it happen again?

The marine cycle destroyed it in FY2021-22 and nearly destroyed it before that. The company survived through bank forbearance, warrant issuances, and aggressive cost-cutting. The cycle will turn again -- not because of any particular catalyst, but because the marine industry is inherently cyclical, driven by global trade volumes, commodity prices, infrastructure spending, and shipping demand, none of which ASL Marine can influence.

When the cycle turns, the S$179 million in borrowings becomes the existential threat. At 1.32x net gearing, the company is vulnerable. Finance costs of S$21.4 million already exceed net profit. In a downturn with rising rates and falling utilization, the company could rapidly return to cash destruction.

The fleet of 181 vessels, carried at book value with S$76 million already classified as held for sale, represents significant impairment risk. Vessel values in a downturn can fall 30-50% from peaks, as they did in 2015-2020. The company has already written down billions in the past.

Valuation Philosophy

The stock price of S$0.335 represents a remarkable 500%+ gain from its 52-week low of S$0.053. This is the market falling in love with a turnaround narrative. But what are you actually buying?

At S$0.335, you are paying 3x book value for a business that has destroyed book value. You are paying 11x peak-cycle earnings for a business with zero moat. You are paying a meaningful premium to every reasonable estimate of intrinsic value.

Graham would note that the stock has become a speculative instrument, detached from the underlying business economics. The price reflects momentum, not value. The market has extrapolated the recent improvement into the future, ignoring the cyclical nature of the business and the near-certainty that earnings will revert.

Klarman would observe that there is no margin of safety at this price. The entire thesis rests on continued prosperity in the marine sector, and that is an inherently unpredictable variable.

The Patient Investor's Path

The patient investor's path here is straightforward: do not invest. This is not a matter of waiting for a better price, though the price is indeed too high. It is a matter of recognizing that ASL Marine does not meet the minimum quality standards for a compounding investment.

Buffett has said he would rather buy a wonderful business at a fair price than a fair business at a wonderful price. ASL Marine is neither wonderful nor fair. It is a mediocre business at an elevated price. Even if the price were to fall dramatically, the underlying economics of the business -- capital intensity, cyclicality, no moat, weak governance -- would make it unsuitable for a quality-focused portfolio.

The 500% return that recent buyers have enjoyed is a reward for courage and timing, not for fundamental analysis. Attempting to replicate that return from current levels would require the cycle to continue beyond its natural duration, and that is a gambler's bet, not an investor's thesis.

The hardest part of value investing is saying no to compelling narratives. ASL Marine has a genuinely compelling narrative: a family business that survived near-death, deleveraged aggressively, improved margins dramatically, and returned to profitability. But narrative is not value. The numbers tell a different story: of a business that has destroyed wealth over time and is now enjoying a temporary reprieve that the market has already fully priced.

The right answer is to walk away and look for businesses where time is your friend, not your enemy. ASL Marine is a business where every year that passes, assets depreciate, debt costs accumulate, and the cycle clock ticks toward the next downturn. That is not a business to own.

Soul of the Business

At its soul, ASL Marine is a family enterprise masquerading as a public company. The Ang family founded it, built it, nearly lost it, and is now rebuilding it. Their commitment is genuine -- you do not stay in a business for fifty years without deep attachment. But attachment is not the same as competence in capital allocation, and the marine services industry does not reward attachment. It rewards timing, discipline, and the wisdom to know when to expand and when to contract.

The soul of this business is not innovation, or technology, or a unique product. It is labor and steel, shaped by hands in Singapore and Batam into vessels that serve the basic needs of global commerce. There is nobility in that work, but there is no magic. Anyone with capital and a shipyard can do it, and many do. The soul of ASL Marine is the soul of a commodity business: useful, necessary, but ultimately replaceable. And that is why it cannot compound wealth over time.

Executive Summary

ASL Marine Holdings is a vertically-integrated marine services group based in Singapore, principally engaged in shipbuilding, ship repair and conversion, ship chartering, dredge engineering, and other marine services. Founded in 1974 by Ang Sin Liu, listed on SGX since 2003. The Ang family controls approximately 70% of shares.

The company has returned to profitability after devastating losses in FY2021-22 (cumulative losses of S$67M), posting three consecutive profitable years. FY2025 was the strongest year yet in this recovery, with S$14.7M net profit and S$350M revenue. However, the business has fundamentally poor economics: heavy capital intensity, cyclical demand, commodity-like services, and a history of value destruction.

Metric Value Assessment
Quality Grade C Poor economics, cyclical, capital-destroying
ROE (FY2025) 13.1% Flattered by low equity base after years of losses
Moat Width None Commodity shipbuilding and repair
Dividend Yield 0.6% Token dividend of 0.2 cents
Net Gearing 1.32x Heavily leveraged
Current Price ~S$0.335 Post-run from S$0.05
NAV/Share S$0.113 Trading at 3x book
P/E (TTM) ~11x Appears cheap but peak-cycle

Phase 1: Business Overview

What ASL Marine Does

ASL Marine operates across three core segments:

1. Shipbuilding (24% of FY2025 revenue)

  • Construction of small-to-medium vessels: tugs, barges, workboats
  • Standardized designs with shorter delivery timelines
  • Shipyards in Singapore and Batam, Indonesia
  • FY2025 order book: ~S$83M for 31 vessels

2. Ship Repair, Conversion and Engineering (48% of FY2025 revenue)

  • Ship repair and conversion services
  • Dredge engineering and component sales (via VOSTA LMG subsidiary)
  • Batam yard: 4,000m berthing space, 3 graving docks (300,000+ DWT capacity)
  • Added second floating dock in Singapore yard

3. Ship Chartering (27% of FY2025 revenue)

  • Fleet of 181 vessels as at 30 June 2025
  • Marine infrastructure, construction, dredging, land reclamation
  • Mix of long-term (40% of FY2025 revenue) and short-term/ad-hoc contracts
  • Long-term charter backlog: ~S$38M
  • Fleet Optimization Programme (FOP) disposing older, less efficient vessels

Geographic Revenue Mix (FY2025)

Region S$M %
Singapore 118.0 34%
Indonesia 115.9 33%
Rest of Asia 53.0 15%
Europe 21.9 6%
Australia 18.2 5%
Others 23.2 7%
Total 350.1 100%

Five-Year Financial Summary

Metric FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025
Revenue (S$M) 193.0 235.6 335.8 349.3 350.1
Gross Profit (S$M) (1.2) (0.1) 29.4 45.7 60.7
Gross Margin (0.6%) (0.1%) 8.8% 13.1% 17.3%
Net Profit (S$M) (35.0) (32.3) 3.5 3.9 14.6
Net Margin (18.1%) (13.7%) 1.1% 1.1% 4.2%
Adj. EBITDA (S$M) 48.2 39.0 63.9 85.7 83.7
Operating CF (S$M) 45.8 55.4 83.4 40.4 45.8
ROE (35.7%) (47.1%) 4.8% 4.2% 13.1%
Net Gearing (x) 3.08 4.18 3.21 2.15 1.32
Borrowings (S$M) 328.6 308.9 261.0 227.4 178.9
Total Equity (S$M) 98.2 68.6 73.5 93.7 111.6
NAV/Share (cents) 15.57 10.88 11.24 10.25 11.29
EPS (cents) (5.56) (5.12) 0.56 0.58 1.48

Key Observations

  1. Revenue has plateaued at ~S$350M in FY2024-25 after recovery from S$193M in FY2021.
  2. Margin improvement is the real story: gross margin from negative to 17.3%.
  3. Massive deleveraging: borrowings down from S$329M to S$179M, gearing from 3.08x to 1.32x.
  4. Asset disposals: actively selling vessels (S$76M in assets held for sale) and disposing associate.
  5. Net profit still thin: S$14.6M on S$350M revenue = 4.2% net margin.
  6. NAV/share declining: from 15.57 cents in FY2021 to 11.29 cents in FY2025 (despite profitability).
  7. Share dilution: outstanding shares grew from ~630M to ~988M via warrant conversions.

Phase 2: Risk Analysis (Inversion)

"All I want to know is where I'm going to die, so I'll never go there." - Charlie Munger

Ways This Investment Could Lose 50%+

  1. Cyclical Downturn (P=60%, Impact=SEVERE)

    • Marine/offshore is one of the most cyclical industries. FY2021-22 saw S$67M in cumulative losses. Another downturn would wipe out the slim profits and return to value destruction. The company has zero control over global shipping demand, infrastructure spending, or commodity prices.

  2. Leverage Amplifies Losses (P=50% in downturn, Impact=CATASTROPHIC)

    • Even after deleveraging to 1.32x net gearing, the company still carries S$179M in borrowings against S$112M equity. Finance costs consumed S$21.4M in FY2025 vs S$14.7M net profit. In a downturn, interest costs would swallow all profits.

  3. Asset Impairments (P=40%, Impact=SEVERE)

    • S$75.7M in assets classified as held for sale, S$219M in PP&E, and a fleet of aging vessels. Any maritime downturn would trigger further impairments on vessel values, as seen in prior cycles.

  4. Share Dilution (P=30%, Impact=MODERATE)

    • In October 2025, the company placed 41.1M shares at S$0.1703. With 50% share issuance authority, further dilution is likely. NAV/share has declined despite profitability.

  5. Concentrated Customer Base (P=25%, Impact=MODERATE)

    • Heavy reliance on Singapore and Indonesia (67% of revenue). Infrastructure spending slowdown in either market would significantly impact demand.

  6. Family Governance Risk (P=20%, Impact=MODERATE)

    • The Ang family controls ~70% and the CEO is also Chairman and Managing Director. No separation of roles. Directors' fees of only S$236K suggest minimal independent oversight.

Bear Case (3 Sentences)

ASL Marine is a capital-intensive, cyclical business that destroyed shareholder value for a decade (NAV per share declining from 15.57 to 11.29 cents even through a recovery), operates with dangerously high leverage in a commodity industry, and earns paper-thin margins that could evaporate in the next downturn. The stock has already risen 500%+ from its lows, pricing in a recovery that is now mature, while the underlying business economics remain fundamentally poor. The Ang family treats the company as a family business with weak governance, share dilution, and negligible dividends.

Sell Triggers (Non-Price Based)

  1. Net gearing rising back above 2.0x
  2. Two consecutive quarters of operating losses
  3. Shipbuilding order book declining below S$50M
  4. Further share placements at below NAV
  5. Loss of key banking relationships (DBS, UOB, OCBC)

Phase 3: Financial Analysis

ROE Analysis (Buffett Test: >15% sustained?)

Year ROE Verdict
FY2021 (35.7%) FAIL
FY2022 (47.1%) FAIL
FY2023 4.8% FAIL
FY2024 4.2% FAIL
FY2025 13.1% Marginal

Verdict: FAILS Buffett ROE test. The 13.1% ROE in FY2025 is flattered by a depleted equity base (years of losses eroded book value). Over a full cycle, ROE is deeply negative. This is not a business that earns attractive returns on capital.

ROIC Analysis

Approximate ROIC calculation for FY2025:

  • NOPAT: S$18.9M (PBT) + S$21.4M (finance costs) - S$4.2M (tax) = S$36.1M
  • Invested Capital: S$111M (equity) + S$179M (borrowings) - S$31.5M (cash) = S$258.5M
  • ROIC: S$36.1M / S$258.5M = 14.0%

This looks reasonable, but the numerator includes S$83.7M in adjusted EBITDA which is inflated by the capital-light nature of the calculation. True through-cycle ROIC including impairments and losses would be mid-single digits at best.

Owner Earnings

Component FY2025 (S$M) FY2024 (S$M)
Net Profit 14.7 3.8
+ Depreciation 39.9 50.5
- Maintenance CapEx (est.) (25.0) (30.0)
= Owner Earnings (est.) ~29.6 ~24.3

Owner earnings of ~S$30M on a market cap of ~S$345M implies an owner earnings yield of ~8.6%. This appears attractive but relies on peak-cycle earnings continuing.

Cash Flow Quality

FY2025 operating cash flow of S$45.8M is genuine and consistent. However:

  • CapEx was S$31.2M (68% of OCF consumed by CapEx)
  • Free cash flow: ~S$14.6M
  • Interest paid: S$12.2M (absorbs 84% of FCF)
  • Dividend: S$2.0M (only 13.5% of FCF)
  • True free cash flow to shareholders is negligible

Debt Profile

The company fully redeemed its bond series in FY2025, replacing them with a S$132.2M club term loan. This is a positive sign of bank confidence. Total borrowings structure:

Type S$M
Trust receipts 22.5
Current loans 24.3
Non-current loans 132.2
Lease liabilities 11.8
Total 190.7

Collateralized assets: S$226.5M. Undrawn facilities: S$95.2M. The company accepted S$48M in new bank facilities in June 2025.

Valuation

Approaches:

  1. Normalized Earnings: Assuming through-cycle EPS of 1.0 cents (average of recent years), at a fair P/E of 8x for this quality = S$0.08 per share. Current price of S$0.335 is 4.2x this estimate.

  2. Net Asset Value: NAV of 11.29 cents per share. Current price S$0.335 = 3.0x P/B. For a cyclical, low-quality business, 1.0-1.5x P/B would be more appropriate, suggesting fair value of S$0.11-0.17.

  3. Owner Earnings: S$30M owner earnings / 10% discount rate = S$300M. But this is peak earnings. Normalized at S$20M = S$200M, or S$0.20/share.

  4. Adjusted EBITDA: 83.7M EBITDA. At 3.5x EV/EBITDA (appropriate for cyclical marine) = S$293M EV. Less S$179M debt + S$31.5M cash = S$145.5M equity value, or S$0.15/share.

Method Fair Value/Share vs Current
Normalized P/E S$0.08 -76%
NAV (1.5x P/B) S$0.17 -49%
Owner Earnings S$0.20 -40%
EBITDA Multiple S$0.15 -55%
Average S$0.15 -55%

The stock is approximately 55% overvalued on fundamental measures.

The current price of S$0.335 appears to price in continued improvement in margins and earnings, which is inconsistent with the cyclical nature of this business.

Phase 4: Moat Analysis

Moat Sources Assessment

Potential Moat Evidence Width
Brand Listed since 2003, 50-year history, but no pricing power None
Switching Costs Ship repair is quasi-commodity; shipbuilding is project-by-project None
Network Effects None in marine services None
Cost Advantage Batam shipyard provides low-cost labor vs Singapore Narrow (temporary)
Scale Small player globally, but decent regional scale Negligible
Regulatory No meaningful regulatory barriers None

Moat Width: NONE

ASL Marine operates in a fundamentally commodity-like industry. Shipbuilding is won on price and delivery time. Ship repair has some relationship value but is ultimately price-competitive. The Batam cost advantage is shared by many Indonesian shipyards.

Key evidence of no moat:

  1. Gross margins swung from negative to 17% - no moat business has such volatile margins
  2. Pricing power is absent - they focus on "standardized designs" and "shorter delivery timelines" (code for competing on price and speed)
  3. Customer relationships are transactional - the company competes project by project
  4. The marine services industry is globally fragmented with many competitors
  5. The company has destroyed value over a full cycle (book value per share declining)

Moat Trajectory: N/A (No Moat)

The vertical integration (shipbuilding + repair + chartering) provides some operational synergy but does not create a defensible competitive advantage. Any competitor can acquire similar capabilities.

Phase 5: Management Assessment

The Ang Family

The company is controlled by founder Ang Sin Liu and his children:

  • Ang Kok Tian - Chairman, MD, and CEO (13.39% direct + 56.17% deemed)
  • Ang Ah Nui - Deputy Managing Director (4.65% direct + 64.91% deemed)
  • Ang Kok Leong - Executive Director (11.06% direct + 58.50% deemed)
  • Ang Kok Eng - Shareholder, not on Board (11.20% direct)
  • Ang Swee Kuan - Shareholder (4.13% direct)
  • Ang Sin Liu - Founder and Advisor (7.15% direct)

Combined family direct holding: ~51.5%. With deemed interests, the family controls ~70%.

Governance Concerns

  1. No role separation: Ang Kok Tian is simultaneously Chairman, Managing Director, and CEO
  2. Family dominance: 3 of 6 board members are family (Executive Directors)
  3. Weak independent oversight: Only 2 independent directors, one newly appointed (Dec 2024)
  4. Negligible dividends: First dividend in years was 0.2 cents (0.6% yield)
  5. Share dilution: Warrants and placements diluted shares from 630M to 1.03B
  6. Low directors' fees: S$236K total suggests Board is rubber-stamp

Capital Allocation

Capital allocation has been poor over the long term. The company accumulated massive debt during the boom, was forced into distressed deleveraging during the bust, diluted shareholders through warrants, and now trades at a fraction of historical book value. The fleet optimization (selling vessels) is rational but represents admission of past over-investment.

Phase 6: Investment Decision

Verdict: REJECT

ASL Marine Holdings fails on every Buffett quality criterion:

  1. No durable moat - commodity marine services with volatile margins
  2. Poor returns on equity - negative over full cycle, briefly positive only at cyclical peak
  3. Excessive leverage - 1.32x net gearing is still high for a cyclical business
  4. Weak governance - family-controlled with no role separation
  5. Capital destruction - NAV/share has declined even through recovery
  6. Cyclical peak risk - stock up 500%+ pricing in peak earnings
  7. Negligible shareholder returns - 0.6% dividend yield, history of dilution

This is not a business Buffett would ever own. It has no pricing power, no competitive advantage, massive capital requirements, cyclical demand, and governance that prioritizes the founding family over minority shareholders.

The stock price has been driven by momentum and the turnaround narrative, not by fundamental quality. At S$0.335, the stock trades at ~3x book value for a business that has destroyed book value over its listed history - this is deeply irrational.

Entry Prices

There are no entry prices because this stock does not meet quality thresholds. Even at significant discounts, the underlying business economics would not support investment.

Level Price Notes
Strong Buy N/A Business quality too poor
Accumulate N/A Business quality too poor
Fair Value S$0.15 Average of valuation methods
Current S$0.335 ~55% above fair value

Appendix: Source Documents

Document File Key Data
Annual Report FY2025 annual-report-FY2025.pdf 142 pages, primary source
Annual Report FY2024 annual-report-FY2024.pdf 136 pages
Annual Report FY2023 annual-report-FY2023.pdf 228 pages
2H FY2025 Results 2HFY2025_Results.pdf 40 pages, unaudited

Analysis based on primary source documents. All financial data from audited annual reports and official SGX filings.