Back to Portfolio
AMD

Advanced Micro Devices

$231.83 USD 377.4B market cap January 17, 2026
Advanced Micro Devices Inc AMD BUFFETT / MUNGER / KLARMAN SUMMARY
1 SNAPSHOT
Price$231.83
Market CapUSD 377.4B
EVUSD 374.0B
Net DebtUSD -1.6B
Shares1.63B
2 BUSINESS

AMD designs high-performance CPUs (EPYC for data centers, Ryzen for PCs), GPUs (Instinct for AI/data center, Radeon for gaming), and adaptive computing solutions (via Xilinx acquisition). Revenue split: Data Center 50%, Client 30%, Gaming 7%, Embedded 13%. Fabless model with TSMC manufacturing.

Revenue: USD 25.8B Organic Growth: 14%
3 MOAT NARROW

Chiplet architecture enables cost-effective performance scaling. x86 duopoly with Intel for CPUs. Growing data center relationships with Microsoft, Meta, Google. ROCm software stack improving but still behind Nvidia's CUDA ecosystem. Brand strength in gaming/enthusiast market. CEO Lisa Su credibility as execution leader.

4 MANAGEMENT
CEO: Dr. Lisa Su (since 2014)

R&D-focused (25% of revenue); opportunistic buybacks ($862M in 2024); strategic M&A (Xilinx, Silo AI, ZT Systems); no dividend (reinvestment priority). Excellent track record transforming AMD from near-bankruptcy to $377B market cap.

5 ECONOMICS
7.4% Op Margin
3.5% ROIC
USD 2.4B FCF
-0.3x Debt/EBITDA
6 VALUATION
FCF/ShareUSD 1.47
FCF Yield0.64%
DCF RangeUSD 78 – 156

Owner earnings $3.7B; 25% CAGR years 1-5 (AI ramp); 10% CAGR years 6-10; 3% terminal growth; 11% discount rate. Bull case assumes 35% CAGR; Bear case 15% CAGR.

7 MUNGER INVERSION -46%
Kill Event Severity P() E[Loss]
Nvidia ecosystem lock-in persists; CUDA remains dominant -50% 25% -12.5%
AI capital expenditure cycle downturn (hyperscaler pause) -45% 20% -9.0%
Valuation compression (P/E normalizes to 25x) -50% 25% -12.5%
Execution stumble on MI350/MI400 roadmap -40% 15% -6.0%
China export restrictions intensify -20% 30% -6.0%

Tail Risk: Taiwan geopolitical event would be catastrophic (100% TSMC dependency). AI bubble burst could compress multiples 70%+. Complete loss of hyperscaler deals to Nvidia would strand $5B+ in GPU capacity investments.

8 KLARMAN LENS
Downside Case

At 25x normalized earnings ($3/share), AMD trades at $75. If AI GPU growth disappoints and EPYC share gains stall, the stock could revisit 2022 lows ($55-80 range). 60%+ downside from current levels.

Why Market Wrong

No clear mispricing exists at current valuation. The market is pricing AMD correctly for a bullish AI infrastructure scenario. If anything, the stock may be expensive given execution risks and Nvidia's competitive moat.

Why Market Right

Bears are right that: (1) 122x trailing P/E leaves no room for error, (2) Nvidia's CUDA ecosystem is deeply entrenched, (3) AI capex cycles eventually normalize, and (4) custom silicon from hyperscalers reduces TAM.

Catalysts

MI350 launch (mid-2025) with 35x performance improvement could accelerate share gains. Hyperscaler deal announcements. Data center GPU revenue trajectory toward $10-15B annually. ROCm achieving CUDA parity.

9 VERDICT WAIT
A- T2 Resilient
Strong Buy$95
Buy$120
Sell$300

AMD is a high-quality company with exceptional management executing well in the AI revolution. However, at 122x trailing P/E and $232/share, the stock prices in near-perfect execution with minimal margin of safety. Wait for a 40-50% correction to $95-120 range before initiating a position. The opportunity will come when AI hype fades or a quarterly miss triggers a selloff in this high-beta stock.

🧠 ULTRATHINK Deep Philosophical Analysis

AMD - Ultrathink Analysis

A Buffett/Munger Meditation on Advanced Micro Devices


The Real Question

What problem are we actually solving by investing here?

The core proposition is this: Can AMD become a meaningful second source in the most important technology market of the next decadeβ€”AI compute infrastructure?

The world is spending hundreds of billions building AI data centers. Nvidia has 85%+ share and a moat called CUDA. AMD is the only x86 company with competitive AI accelerators. The question isn't whether AMD is a good company (it clearly is). The question is: At 122x earnings, what outcome is already priced in?

At current valuation, we're betting that AMD captures 15-20% of a $500B+ market and maintains premium margins against both Nvidia and custom silicon. This isn't contrarian investingβ€”it's consensus betting at peak optimism.


Hidden Assumptions

The market is making several assumptions that may prove wrong:

1. CUDA Doesn't Matter as Much as We Think

The bull case requires believing ROCm will achieve functional parity with CUDA such that large customers (hyperscalers, enterprises) will diversify their GPU spend. This assumes software matters less than price/performance.

The hidden bet: Maybe CUDA's lock-in is weaker than feared because hyperscalers have internal software teams that can port workloads.

The counter: Enterprises don't have those teams. Consumer AI startups standardize on CUDA tutorials. The long tail of AI adoption may still favor Nvidia's ecosystem.

2. AI Capex Continues Its Vertical Trajectory

Current spending levels assume AI models require exponentially more compute. DeepSeek's efficiency breakthroughs suggest software innovation might reduce hardware requirements per capability level.

The hidden bet: Even if individual models need less compute, the proliferation of AI applications across every industry will more than offset efficiency gains.

The counter: Capital cycles always normalize. Hyperscaler CFOs will eventually question ROI on AI spend. A single quarter of capex reduction guidance would crater AMD stock 30%+.

3. Lisa Su's Magic Is Repeatable

AMD's transformation from 2015-2025 is one of the greatest corporate turnarounds in history. But much of the low-hanging fruit (Intel's stumbles, Zen architecture, TSMC partnership) has been harvested.

The hidden bet: The same execution DNA will navigate the AI competitive landscape.

The counter: Past performance doesn't guarantee future results. The competitive dynamics of AI (Nvidia's scale, custom chips, ARM in data centers) are fundamentally different from the x86 CPU market AMD conquered.


The Contrarian View

What would have to be true for the bears to be right?

If I were short AMD, my thesis would be:

"AMD is a brilliant company that created the illusion of an AI moat. They captured hyperscaler design wins because buyers wanted leverage over Nvidia, not because MI300 was superior. Once Blackwell Ultra ships and DeepSeek-style efficiency gains reduce compute requirements, hyperscalers will quietly shift back to their primary vendor. AMD's $5B of 'AI revenue' becomes $3B, and the stock trades at 25xβ€”$75/share."

For this to happen:

  1. Nvidia maintains pricing power despite AMD competition
  2. Custom chips (Amazon Trainium, Google TPU, Microsoft Maia) absorb incremental AI capex
  3. AI capex growth slows from 50%+ to 15% (normal tech infrastructure growth)
  4. AMD's ROCm never achieves critical mass in enterprise

Probability: 30-40%. Not the base case, but not a tail risk either.


Simplest Thesis

AMD is too expensive for a Buffett-style investment, but too well-managed to short.

One sentence: A great company at a fair price is superior to a great company at a ridiculous priceβ€”and $232 for AMD is ridiculous.


Why This Opportunity Exists

Actually, it doesn't. That's the point.

At $232, we are not being offered an opportunity. We are being offered the chance to pay 122x earnings for a company that:

  • Has a 2.9% ROE (distorted by purchase accounting, but still)
  • Competes against the most dominant moat in tech (CUDA)
  • Depends 100% on a single foundry in a geopolitically sensitive region
  • Has already rallied 91% in the past year

The opportunity will exist when:

  • A quarterly miss sends the stock down 30-40%
  • AI hype fades and tech multiples compress
  • A macro correction triggers a flight from high-beta stocks
  • China tensions escalate and Taiwan-dependent stocks derate

The patient investor's advantage is saying "no" to good companies at bad prices.


What Would Change My Mind

I would consider buying AMD if:

  1. Price hits $95-120 (40-50% decline from current levels)

    • This provides a genuine margin of safety against execution risk
  2. ROCm achieves demonstrable CUDA parity

    • Not marketing claimsβ€”actual enterprise adoption metrics
    • Hugging Face model support growing 5x; major AI frameworks native on ROCm
  3. MI350/MI400 wins major training workloads

    • Current strength is inference; training wins would prove competitive parity
    • Microsoft or Meta using AMD for GPT-5 class training would be transformational
  4. Nvidia stumbles

    • Supply issues, execution failure, regulatory problems
    • Creates a window where hyperscalers must diversify
  5. AI capex cycle proves durable post-2025

    • If 2026-2027 capex grows 30%+, the TAM story holds
    • Currently pricing in this scenario; evidence it's real would de-risk thesis

The Soul of This Business

AMD's soul is execution against a more established competitor.

This has been the company's identity for 55 years. They were Intel's second source. They were Nvidia's cheaper alternative. They were the underdog that almost died in 2014-2015 and rose from the ashes.

What makes this soul durable:

  • Engineering culture that iterates relentlessly
  • Chiplet architecture that scales cost-effectively
  • Lisa Su's credibility with customers and Wall Street
  • x86 ecosystem lock-in (billions of existing applications)

What makes this soul fragile:

  • AMD has never dominated. They win by being "good enough" at a better price
  • If competitors close the performance gap, AMD's value proposition narrows
  • The AI market may converge to a single winner (network effects favor consolidation)
  • TSMC dependency means AMD doesn't control its own destiny

The question of soul: Is AMD a company that wins markets, or a company that survives in markets by being second-best?

History suggests the latter. The stock price assumes the former.


The Patient Investor's Path

What to do right now: Nothing. Add to watchlist. Wait.

What to watch for:

  • Earnings misses (AMD guides quarterly; any softness triggers selloff)
  • AI narrative fatigue (Nvidia down 20%+ would drag AMD further)
  • Macro correction (high-beta stocks fall 1.5-2x the market)
  • Management commentary on competitive dynamics

Entry strategy when price is right:

  • $120: Start 1.5% position
  • $95: Add to 3% position
  • $75: Full 4% position (thesis confirmed by valuation, not price collapse on fundamentals)

The Munger test: If AMD dropped 50% tomorrow, would I be excited to buy more or would I panic?

At $232, I'd be relieved I didn't own it. At $95, I'd be excited to back Lisa Su.

That tells you everything about whether to invest today.


"The stock market is a device for transferring money from the impatient to the patient." β€” Warren Buffett

AMD requires patience. The price will come to us.

Executive Summary

Investment Thesis (3 Sentences)

AMD is a semiconductor company executing exceptionally well on its multi-year transformation from a struggling CPU maker to a leading provider of high-performance computing solutions for data centers, PCs, and gaming. The company's Instinct AI accelerators (MI300/350 series) position it as the only credible competitor to Nvidia's dominance in the $500B+ AI accelerator market by 2028. However, current valuation at 122x trailing P/E and 37x forward P/E prices in near-flawless execution on AI growth, leaving minimal margin of safety.

Key Metrics Dashboard

Metric Value Assessment
P/E (TTM) 122x Extremely expensive
P/E (Forward) 37x Premium valuation
EV/EBITDA 60x Very high
P/S 11.8x Aggressive
P/B 6.2x Growth premium
FCF Yield 0.64% Very low
ROE (Latest) 2.9% Below Buffett threshold
ROE (5yr Avg) 18.3% Acceptable
Revenue CAGR (5yr) 21.4% Strong growth
Debt/Equity 0.20 Conservative
Beta 1.95 High volatility

Decision: WAIT - Buy at $160 or below

Position Size: 2-3% at target price Primary Risk: Nvidia's ecosystem lock-in; AI capex slowdown Catalyst: MI350 launch mid-2025; Data center GPU revenue scaling


Phase 0: Opportunity Identification (Klarman)

Why Does This Opportunity Exist?

Answer: It doesn't exist at current prices.

AMD trades at a significant premium reflecting AI growth expectations. The opportunity will only emerge if:

  1. Market overreaction to near-term earnings miss - One weak quarter could cause a 30%+ selloff given high expectations
  2. Nvidia competitive announcement - New Blackwell Ultra or pricing pressure could compress AMD's perceived opportunity
  3. AI infrastructure spending pause - Hyperscaler capex slowdown would hit all AI hardware names
  4. Macro correction - High-beta stocks like AMD (Ξ²=1.95) fall more than market in downturns

Current State: No mispricing evident. Stock is up 91% in past year, trading near 52-week highs. Institutional ownership at 70%. Analyst consensus is overwhelmingly bullish (40 Buy, 11 Hold, 0 Sell).


Phase 1: Risk Analysis (Inversion Thinking)

"How Could This Investment Lose 50%+ Permanently?"

Top 10 Risk Events

Risk Severity Probability Expected Impact
1. Nvidia ecosystem lock-in -50% 25% -12.5%
2. AI capex cycle downturn -45% 20% -9.0%
3. Intel resurgence -30% 15% -4.5%
4. TSMC supply/pricing squeeze -25% 20% -5.0%
5. China export restrictions -20% 30% -6.0%
6. ROCm software gaps persist -35% 20% -7.0%
7. Customer concentration (hyperscalers) -25% 15% -3.75%
8. Lisa Su departure -20% 5% -1.0%
9. Execution stumble on MI350/400 -40% 15% -6.0%
10. Valuation compression (no growth premium) -50% 25% -12.5%

Total Expected Downside: -67.25% (risk-adjusted weighted)

Deep Dive: Top 3 Risks

1. Nvidia Ecosystem Lock-in (CUDA Moat)

  • Nvidia's CUDA has 15+ years of developer adoption
  • 95% of AI frameworks optimized for CUDA first
  • ROCm is improving but still requires porting effort
  • Hyperscalers with internal software teams (Microsoft, Meta) can adapt; enterprises may struggle
  • Mitigation: AMD's open-source strategy, growing ROCm support (1M+ Hugging Face models)

2. AI Capital Expenditure Cycle

  • 2024-2025 hyperscaler capex is at record levels ($200B+ combined)
  • DeepSeek-style efficiency gains could reduce compute requirements per model
  • "Stargate" and similar announcements suggest multi-year runway, but cycles are inevitable
  • A 6-12 month pause would devastate AMD's growth narrative at 122x P/E
  • Mitigation: Diversification across PC, gaming, embedded (50% of revenue)

3. TSMC Dependency

  • 100% of leading-edge chips manufactured by TSMC
  • Any Taiwan geopolitical event = catastrophic
  • TSMC prioritizes Apple > Nvidia > AMD in supply allocation
  • CoWoS capacity constraints already impacting MI300 ramp
  • Mitigation: Long-term agreements; ZT Systems acquisition for system-level integration

The Bear Case (3 Sentences)

AMD's AI GPU revenue ($5B in 2024) is 10% of Nvidia's ($50B+), with inferior margins and weaker ecosystem lock-in. The company's trailing ROE of 2.9% and 122x P/E suggest investors are paying for a future that requires AMD to become the next Nvidiaβ€”a low-probability outcome. If AI infrastructure spending normalizes or Nvidia maintains >80% market share, AMD's valuation compresses to 30x earnings ($60-80/share).

Pre-Defined Sell Triggers (Non-Price)

  1. Thesis Break: MI350 market share below 10% of addressable market by Q4 2025
  2. Moat Erosion: Microsoft, Meta, or Google announce exclusive long-term Nvidia deals
  3. Management Failure: Lisa Su departure without credible successor; R&D investment cuts
  4. Competitive: Intel Gaudi 3 or custom hyperscaler chips gain 20%+ AI training share

Phase 2: Financial Analysis

ROE Decomposition (DuPont, 5 Years)

Year ROE Net Margin Asset Turnover Equity Multiplier
2024 2.9% 6.4% 0.37x 1.20x
2023 1.5% 3.8% 0.33x 1.21x
2022 2.4% 5.6% 0.35x 1.23x
2021 42.2% 19.2% 1.32x 1.66x
2020 42.7% 25.5% 1.09x 1.54x

Analysis: 2022-2024 ROE collapsed due to Xilinx acquisition ($49B) massively increasing equity base and intangible amortization depressing net income. Pre-acquisition, AMD was a high-ROE compounder. Current ROE is distorted by purchase accounting; normalized ROE (ex-intangibles) would be ~8-10%.

Owner Earnings Calculation

Owner Earnings (2024):
  Net Income:          $1.64B
  + D&A:               $3.18B
  - Maintenance CapEx: $0.32B (50% of total CapEx)
  - Ξ”Working Capital:  $0.80B
  ─────────────────────────────
  Owner Earnings:      $3.70B

Per Share (1.63B shares): $2.27

Valuation Trinity

1. Liquidation Value (Floor)

Net Current Assets: $19.0B - $7.3B = $11.7B
Tangible Book: $57.6B - $24.8B (GW) - $18.9B (Intang.) = $13.9B

Per Share: $13.9B / 1.63B = $8.53

Not relevant for going concern; AMD is not a cigar butt.

2. DCF Valuation (Owner Earnings)

Conservative Assumptions:

  • Owner Earnings 2024: $3.7B
  • Growth Years 1-5: 25% CAGR (AI ramp)
  • Growth Years 6-10: 10% CAGR (maturation)
  • Terminal Growth: 3%
  • Discount Rate: 11% (WACC)
Year Owner Earnings
2024 $3.70B
2029 $11.14B
2034 $17.95B

Terminal Value: $17.95B Γ— (1.03) / (0.11 - 0.03) = $231B

DCF Value: $178B β†’ $109/share

Bull Case (35% CAGR years 1-5): $156/share Bear Case (15% CAGR years 1-5): $78/share

3. Private Market Value

Recent semiconductor M&A multiples:

  • Xilinx: 11.4x EV/Revenue (2022)
  • Nvidia market: 25x+ EV/Revenue

AMD at 5x Revenue (private market discount): $130B β†’ $80/share AMD at 8x Revenue (strategic premium): $208B β†’ $128/share

Valuation Summary

Method Value/Share Current Price MOS
DCF (Conservative) $109 $232 -113% (overvalued)
DCF (Bull) $156 $232 -49% (overvalued)
DCF (Bear) $78 $232 -197% (overvalued)
Owner Earnings (15x) $34 $232 -582% (overvalued)
Owner Earnings (25x) $57 $232 -307% (overvalued)
Private Market $80-128 $232 -81% to -113%

Conclusion: Current price ($232) is significantly above all valuation methods. No margin of safety exists.

Margin of Safety Calculation

Intrinsic Value Estimate (weighted average):

  • 40% DCF Conservative: $109
  • 30% DCF Bull: $156
  • 20% Private Market (8x): $128
  • 10% Owner Earnings (25x): $57

Weighted IV: $119/share

Current MOS: ($119 - $232) / $119 = -95% (OVERVALUED)


Phase 3: Moat Analysis

Moat Sources

Source Strength Durability Evidence
Technology/IP Strong 5-10 years Chiplet architecture, Zen 5, CDNA 4 leadership
Ecosystem Moderate 3-5 years ROCm improving but still behind CUDA
Customer Relationships Strong 5-10 years Deep hyperscaler partnerships (Microsoft, Meta)
Scale Moderate 5-10 years #2 in x86 CPUs, #2 in discrete GPUs
Switching Costs Low-Moderate 3-5 years Software porting required but achievable
Brand Strong 10+ years Lisa Su credibility; gaming/enthusiast loyalty

Moat Width Assessment: NARROW

AMD has a defensible position but lacks the wide moat of Nvidia (CUDA ecosystem) or Intel's historical dominance (now eroding). The chiplet architecture is replicable; TSMC manufactures for everyone.

Forces of Erosion

Threat Severity Timeline AMD Mitigation
Nvidia ecosystem dominance 5/5 Ongoing Open-source ROCm; hyperscaler partnerships
Intel foundry resurgence 3/5 3-5 years Continue execution; maintain tech lead
Custom silicon (Amazon, Google) 4/5 2-5 years Focus on generalist platforms; software
ARM in data center 3/5 5-10 years N/A (AMD has x86 + ARM capabilities)
China domestic chips 2/5 5-10 years Export controls maintain gap

Key Question: "Wider or Narrower in 10 Years?"

Assessment: Narrower β†’ Same

  • Data center GPU moat depends on ROCm achieving CUDA parity (uncertain)
  • x86 CPU moat stable if Intel execution remains poor
  • Gaming and embedded moats stable but not growing
  • AI accelerator landscape highly dynamic; winner not determined

Phase 4: Management & Capital Allocation

Lisa Su - CEO Since 2014

Track Record:

  • Transformed AMD from near-bankruptcy to $377B market cap
  • Executed Zen architecture pivot, regained CPU competitiveness
  • Acquired Xilinx ($49B) for adaptive computing
  • Accelerated AI roadmap to annual product cadence

Compensation (2024):

  • Base Salary: ~$1.3M
  • Total Compensation: ~$30M (90% equity-linked)
  • Ownership: 0.44% ($1.7B+)

Assessment: Exceptional operator with strong alignment. One of the best CEOs in tech.

Capital Allocation (Last 5 Years)

Use of FCF % Assessment
R&D Investment 60%+ Appropriate for competitive position
Share Buybacks 15% $862M in 2024; opportunistic
M&A (Xilinx) Large Strategic but integration ongoing
Dividends 0% Correct for growth company
Debt Paydown 5% Debt levels already conservative

Verdict: Excellent capital allocation focused on long-term competitiveness.

Insider Activity (24 Months)

  • Lisa Su: Regular planned sales (10b5-1) for diversification
  • No unusual insider buying at current prices
  • Low insider ownership (0.44%) typical for mature tech

Phase 5: Catalyst Analysis

Potential Catalysts

Catalyst Timeline Probability Impact
MI350 series launch (CDNA 4) Q2-Q3 2025 85% +20-30%
MI400 series launch 2026 70% +15-25%
Data center GPU revenue > $15B annually 2025-2026 60% +30-40%
Major cloud deal announcement Ongoing 50% +10-15%
Hyperscaler AI capex increases 2025 60% +10-20%

Negative Catalysts

Catalyst Timeline Probability Impact
Nvidia Blackwell Ultra launch Q2 2025 80% -15-25%
AI capex slowdown 2025-2026 25% -30-40%
Intel Gaudi competitive 2025 20% -10-15%
ROCm customer complaints Ongoing 30% -10-20%

Phase 6: Decision Synthesis

Position Sizing Formula

At current prices ($232), ZERO position recommended.

Target entry prices:

  • Strong Buy: $95 (20% below DCF Bear) - 59% decline needed
  • Accumulate: $120 (intrinsic value estimate) - 48% decline needed
  • Fair Value: $150 (DCF Bull scenario)
  • Take Profits: N/A (not buying)

Expected Return Probability Tree

Scenario Probability 3-Year Return Weighted
Bull (AI dominance) 20% +60% +12%
Base (execution continues) 40% +10% +4%
Bear (competition wins) 30% -40% -12%
Disaster (AI bust) 10% -70% -7%
Expected Return 100% -3%

Monitoring Metrics

Metric Current Threshold Action if Breached
Data Center GPU Revenue Growth >100% YoY <30% YoY Reassess thesis
ROCm adoption (Hugging Face models) 1M+ Declining Red flag
EPYC market share ~25% <20% Competitive concern
Gross Margin 54% <48% Pricing pressure
P/E Forward 37x >50x Valuation bubble

Final Recommendation

β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
β”‚                     INVESTMENT RECOMMENDATION                    β”‚
β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€
β”‚ Company: Advanced Micro Devices      Ticker: AMD                β”‚
β”‚ Current Price: $231.83               Date: 2026-01-17           β”‚
β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€
β”‚ VALUATION SUMMARY                                                β”‚
β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ Method                  β”‚ Value/Share β”‚ vs Current Price    β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”Όβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”Όβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ DCF (Conservative)      β”‚ $109        β”‚ -113% (overvalued)  β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ DCF (Bull)              β”‚ $156        β”‚ -49% (overvalued)   β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ DCF (Bear)              β”‚ $78         β”‚ -197% (overvalued)  β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ Owner Earnings (15x)    β”‚ $34         β”‚ -582% (overvalued)  β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ Owner Earnings (25x)    β”‚ $57         β”‚ -307% (overvalued)  β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ Private Market Value    β”‚ $80-128     β”‚ -81% to -113%       β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚
β”‚                                                                  β”‚
β”‚ INTRINSIC VALUE ESTIMATE: $119 (weighted average)               β”‚
β”‚ MARGIN OF SAFETY: -95% (OVERVALUED)                             β”‚
β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€
β”‚ RECOMMENDATION:  [ ] BUY  [ ] HOLD  [ ] SELL  [X] WAIT          β”‚
β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€
β”‚ STRONG BUY PRICE:        $95  (59% below current)               β”‚
β”‚ ACCUMULATE PRICE:        $120 (48% below current)               β”‚
β”‚ FAIR VALUE:              $150                                   β”‚
β”‚ TAKE PROFITS:            N/A                                    β”‚
β”‚ SELL PRICE:              N/A                                    β”‚
β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€
β”‚ POSITION SIZE: 0% (wait for entry)                              β”‚
β”‚ CATALYST: MI350 launch mid-2025; AI infrastructure spending     β”‚
β”‚ PRIMARY RISK: Nvidia ecosystem lock-in; valuation compression   β”‚
β”‚ SELL TRIGGER: Data center GPU growth <30% YoY                   β”‚
β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜

Quality Assessment

Quality Grade: A-

Exceptional management, strong product execution, growing moat in data center. Deducted for:

  • Low current ROE (purchase accounting distortion)
  • Dependency on TSMC
  • Narrow moat vs. Nvidia

Tier: T2 Resilient

Strong growth profile with meaningful competitive position, but not a fortress business.


Appendix: Sources Used

Primary Documents Downloaded

Document Source Local Path
10-K FY2024 SEC EDGAR /analyses/AMD/data/10k-2024.htm
10-K FY2023 SEC EDGAR /analyses/AMD/data/10k-2023.htm
10-K FY2022 SEC EDGAR /analyses/AMD/data/10k-2022.htm
10-K FY2021 SEC EDGAR /analyses/AMD/data/10k-2021.htm
10-K FY2020 SEC EDGAR /analyses/AMD/data/10k-2020.htm

MCP Data Retrieved

Source Data Key Metrics
AlphaVantage Income Statement 5-year revenue, margins, EPS
AlphaVantage Balance Sheet Assets, liabilities, equity
AlphaVantage Cash Flow OCF, CapEx, FCF
AlphaVantage Company Overview Current ratios, multiples
AlphaVantage Earnings Transcripts Q1-Q4 2024 management commentary
EODHD Historical Prices 5-year daily prices (1,519 records)

Data Validation

Metric Primary Source Cross-Check Consistent?
Revenue $25.8B 10-K 2024 AlphaVantage βœ“
Net Income $1.64B 10-K 2024 AlphaVantage βœ“
Total Debt $2.2B 10-K 2024 AlphaVantage βœ“
Market Cap $377B NASDAQ AlphaVantage βœ“