Back to Portfolio
CRH

CRH plc

$122.4 81.8B market cap February 1, 2026
CRH plc CRH BUFFETT / MUNGER / KLARMAN SUMMARY
1 SNAPSHOT
Price$122.4
Market Cap81.8B
2 BUSINESS

CRH is the world's largest building materials company with an irreplaceable asset base of 700+ quarries and cement plants across the developed world. The business has transformed from a European-focused conglomerate into a U.S. infrastructure leader capturing 75% of EBITDA from Americas operations. The company benefits from a once-in-a-generation infrastructure investment cycle (IIJA) with only 30% of highway funds deployed, providing a multi-year demand runway. The moat is wide and durable: aggregates cannot be transported economically beyond 50 miles, new quarry permits take 5-10+ years (if obtainable at all due to NIMBY opposition), and CRH holds #1 or #2 positions in most local markets. Vertical integration from aggregates through asphalt and concrete to finished infrastructure solutions creates additional value capture. Management has compounded capital at 15%+ EBITDA growth for a decade with disciplined M&A and consistent shareholder returns. Seth Klarman's new 8.5% position validates the thesis. However, at 24x earnings, the stock prices in excellent execution and multi-year tailwinds with no margin of safety. The patient investor should wait for Mr. Market to offer this wonderful business at a fair price - the opportunity will come during the next recession or market dislocation.

3 MOAT WIDE

Local Scale Monopoly + Vertical Integration

4 MANAGEMENT
CEO: Albert Manifold (transitioning to Jim Mintern)
5 ECONOMICS
13.8% Op Margin
12.5% ROIC
16% ROE
24.43x P/E
2.37B FCF
6 VALUATION
FCF Yield2.9%
DCF Range105 - 120

Overvalued by 9-17%

7 MUNGER INVERSION
Kill Event Severity P() E[Loss]
Valuation compression if IIJA spending slows or recession hits HIGH - -
Management transition risk as CEO Manifold hands off to Mintern MED - -
8 KLARMAN LENS
Downside Case

Valuation compression if IIJA spending slows or recession hits

Why Market Right

Recession fears / economic slowdown; Federal budget battles and spending cuts; Management transition execution; Integration issues with Texas/Adbri acquisitions

Catalysts

IIJA spending acceleration (70% still to deploy); Interest rate cuts boosting residential construction; Accretive bolt-on acquisitions; Continued pricing power and margin expansion; Reshoring/data center construction boom

9 VERDICT WAIT
A- Quality Strong - investment grade credit with conservative leverage and strong FCF coverage
Strong Buy$85
Buy$100
Fair Value$120

Set price alerts at $100 (Accumulate) and $85 (Strong Buy). Monitor quarterly for execution issues. Be ready to act during market dislocations.

🧠 ULTRATHINK Deep Philosophical Analysis

CRH: Deep Philosophical Analysis

"The stock market is a device for transferring money from the impatient to the patient." - Warren Buffett

The Real Question

The real question with CRH is not whether it's a good business. It obviously is. The real question is whether we can be patient enough to wait for Mr. Market to offer it at the right price, and whether we have the conviction to act decisively when that moment arrives.

Seth Klarman just bought 8.5% of his fund at $115-120. Is he wrong? Is he early? Or does he see something about the duration and magnitude of the infrastructure cycle that justifies paying 24x earnings for a building materials company?

The meta-question: When a legendary value investor pays full price for something, should we follow, or should we trust our own margin of safety discipline?

Hidden Assumptions

Assumption 1: The IIJA is different from previous infrastructure bills. We assume the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act will actually deploy its $550 billion over the next 5-7 years. History is littered with infrastructure plans that never materialized. What's different? This time, only 30% of highway funds have been deployed in 3+ years. The pace suggests bureaucracy, not cancellation. But are we assuming smooth sailing that may not come?

Assumption 2: CRH's local monopolies will persist. We assume NIMBY opposition and permitting timelines will continue to protect existing quarries. But what if AI-enabled permitting speeds the process? What if political pressure to lower construction costs overrides local opposition? These seem unlikely, but we're betting on regulatory capture continuing for decades.

Assumption 3: The transformation to "solutions" is durable. CRH has moved from commodity materials to integrated solutions. We assume customers value this bundling enough to pay premium prices. But what if contractors return to unbundled purchasing when prices rise too high? What if tech platforms disintermediate the relationship?

Assumption 4: Management's acquisition prowess will continue. CRH has deployed billions on M&A at reasonable multiples with good integration. We assume this continues. But as they get larger, targets become scarcer and more expensive. The $2.1B Texas deal and Adbri are larger bets than historical bolt-ons. Will they maintain discipline?

The Contrarian View

The bull case is too consensus. Everyone sees the IIJA. Everyone knows aggregates have local monopolies. Everyone recognizes CRH is the best-run building materials company. When something is this obvious, it's usually priced in.

The contrarian asks: What if CRH is the next value trap disguised as quality? What if 24x earnings for a building materials company - however well-run - is simply too expensive for the asset class?

Consider Holcim at 12x earnings. Yes, CRH has more U.S. exposure. But 2x the multiple for 75% vs. 40% Americas mix? That implies the market believes U.S. infrastructure will massively outperform for years. Possible, but not certain.

The most dangerous phrase in investing is "this time is different." Is the IIJA really different, or is it just the latest infrastructure hype cycle?

The Simplest Thesis (One Sentence)

CRH owns irreplaceable assets (quarries) in the right place (U.S. infrastructure corridors) at the right time (IIJA deployment) with the right management (disciplined capital allocators) - but at the wrong price (24x earnings).

That's it. The entire investment case reduces to: Wonderful business, fair-to-expensive price, wait for better entry.

Why This Opportunity Exists

Paradoxically, the "opportunity" exists precisely because there is no opportunity at current prices.

Mr. Market is efficient enough to recognize CRH's quality. The stock has tripled in 3 years. Klarman's entry has validated the thesis. Analysts are bullish (21 buys, 2 holds, 1 sell).

The real opportunity will exist when:

  1. A recession scares everyone away from cyclicals
  2. A geopolitical event triggers a "sell everything" moment
  3. Management makes a stumble that proves temporary
  4. Interest rates spike and the multiple compresses

The patient investor's edge is not analysis - CRH is well-covered. The edge is temperament - the willingness to do nothing now and act decisively later.

What Would Change My Mind

I would buy at current prices if:

  1. The multiple compression thesis is wrong. If building materials deserve a permanent re-rating due to infrastructure tailwinds and supply constraints, then 20-25x may be the new normal. Evidence needed: sustained multiple above 22x through a recession.

  2. The growth runway is longer than I think. If IIJA is just the beginning - if reshoring, data centers, and housing catch-up drive 10%+ organic growth for a decade - then current prices could be reasonable. Evidence needed: accelerating volume growth, not just pricing.

  3. A transformational acquisition at a great price. If CRH deploys $10B+ on a major deal at 8x EBITDA that significantly expands their competitive position, the calculus changes. Evidence needed: announced deal with clear strategic logic and conservative synergy targets.

I would avoid even at lower prices if:

  1. Management loses capital allocation discipline. If they chase growth with expensive acquisitions or empire-build in non-core areas, the compounding machine breaks. Evidence: multiple high-multiple deals, diversification away from aggregates/infrastructure.

  2. The moat is breached. If new permitting pathways emerge, if vertical integration proves less valuable than assumed, or if a major competitor consolidates and gains scale advantages. Evidence: sustained pricing pressure, margin compression.

  3. Balance sheet deteriorates. If leverage rises above 2.5x EBITDA or if cash flow conversion drops materially. Evidence: credit rating downgrade, dividend cut.

The Soul of This Business

CRH is, at its core, a geology company. It owns rock in the ground - limestone, granite, sand, gravel. These rocks have been there for millions of years and will be there for millions more.

The value creation is not in the rock itself but in three things:

  1. The permit - the legal right to extract that rock, which takes 5-10 years to obtain and faces intense NIMBY opposition. This is the moat.

  2. The location - proximity to growth markets where infrastructure needs that rock. You can't move rock economically more than 50 miles.

  3. The integration - turning that rock into asphalt, concrete, and finished infrastructure solutions that capture more value per ton.

When you strip away the corporate jargon about "solutions strategies" and "operational excellence," CRH is in the business of controlling access to necessary natural resources in growing geographies. It's not that different from owning farmland in Iowa or water rights in Arizona.

The Irish founders understood this in 1970. Fifty years later, the same fundamental truth applies: own the rock near the growth, and the money follows.

The Patient Investor's Path

Current situation: CRH at $122 offers no margin of safety. Fair value is $105-115. The stock is loved by the market.

The temptation: Buy now because Klarman did, because the infrastructure story is compelling, because waiting feels like missing out.

The discipline: Recognize that paying full price for a cyclical business - however high-quality - is a recipe for mediocre returns. The stock could go to $140 before it goes to $90, and that's okay. We don't need to catch every move.

The action plan:

  1. Add to watchlist with price alerts at $100 and $85
  2. Review quarterly earnings for execution missteps
  3. Build conviction through deeper research (IR reports, competitor analysis)
  4. When recession hits (and it will), have dry powder and courage ready
  5. Buy 2-3% at $100, add to 4-5% at $85, size up if truly exceptional opportunity

The mindset: CRH has been around for 50 years. It will be around for 50 more. There is no rush. The patient investor who waits for a 20-30% discount will compound at meaningfully higher rates than the impatient one who pays full price today.

Final Meditation

"Price is what you pay; value is what you get." - Warren Buffett

CRH offers genuine value: irreplaceable assets, proven management, secular tailwinds. But at $122, you pay $122 for $105 of value. That's not value investing; that's growth investing.

There is nothing wrong with growth investing if that's your framework. But for the value investor following Buffett-Munger-Klarman principles, paying above fair value - even for quality - violates first principles.

Klarman himself would likely agree. His entry at $115-120 may reflect:

  • A different fair value calculation (perhaps he uses a lower discount rate)
  • A longer time horizon (Baupost can wait 10 years; can you?)
  • Position sizing that allows for being early (8.5% leaves room to add lower)

The wisdom is not to blindly follow superinvestors but to understand their frameworks and apply our own judgment with our own constraints.

For most investors, the right answer is simple: WAIT. This wonderful business will be on sale eventually. It always is.

"It takes character to sit with all that cash and do nothing. I didn't get to the top where I am by going after mediocre opportunities." - Charlie Munger

Executive Summary

CRH plc is the world's largest building materials company, with dominant positions in aggregates, cement, asphalt, and infrastructure solutions across North America and Europe. The company has transformed from a European-focused conglomerate into a streamlined, U.S.-centric infrastructure play that is the primary beneficiary of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA).

Verdict: WAIT - Accumulate Below $100

The business is exceptional - a true compounder with durable competitive advantages. However, the current valuation at 24x trailing earnings prices in significant infrastructure tailwinds and leaves limited margin of safety. Patient investors should wait for a meaningful pullback.

Phase 0: Opportunity Identification

Why is This Stock Interesting Now?

  1. Seth Klarman's New 8.5% Position: The legendary value investor known for extreme patience has made CRH a significant holding, signaling conviction in the U.S. infrastructure thesis.

  2. IIJA Runway: Less than 30% of the $550 billion Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act highway funds have been deployed. This represents a multi-year, predictable demand driver.

  3. Structural Transformation: CRH has repositioned from a diversified European conglomerate to a focused U.S. infrastructure leader (75% of EBITDA from Americas).

  4. Compounding Machine: 10-year track record of 15% EBITDA CAGR, 19% EPS CAGR, and 16% TSR CAGR.

  5. NYSE Primary Listing (2023): Enhanced U.S. investor access and liquidity after moving primary listing from London.

Why Might This Be Cheap?

The honest answer: It's not cheap. At $122, CRH trades at:

  • P/E (TTM): 24.4x
  • P/E (Forward): 19.9x
  • EV/EBITDA: 13.3x
  • P/FCF: ~35x

The stock has risen 185% over 3 years and 230% over 5 years. The question is whether the current premium is justified by the quality and growth runway.

Phase 1: Risk Analysis (Inversion)

"Invert, always invert." - Charlie Munger

How Could This Investment Fail?

1. IIJA Funding Delays or Cuts (Probability: LOW-MEDIUM)

  • Federal budget battles could slow appropriations
  • Political shifts might redirect infrastructure spending
  • Mitigation: Only 30% deployed; momentum is bipartisan; state DOT budgets also elevated

2. Interest Rate Sensitivity (Probability: MEDIUM)

  • Higher rates hurt residential construction (20% exposure)
  • Acquisition multiples compress when rates are high
  • Mitigation: Infrastructure and non-residential less rate-sensitive; company has pricing power

3. Acquisition Integration Risk (Probability: MEDIUM)

  • $4.6B deployed on 35 acquisitions in 2024 alone
  • Texas ($2.1B) and Adbri (Australia) are transformational
  • Synergy targets ($65M for Texas) may be optimistic
  • Mitigation: Excellent M&A track record; decentralized integration model

4. Cyclical Downturn (Probability: LOW-MEDIUM)

  • Building materials are inherently cyclical
  • 2008-2009 showed CRH can decline 50%+
  • Mitigation: Business now less cyclical (more infrastructure, less residential); stronger balance sheet

5. Valuation Compression (Probability: MEDIUM-HIGH)

  • Current multiple assumes continued growth and execution
  • Any stumble could compress P/E from 24x toward 15x historical average
  • Mitigation: Quality commands premium; Klarman's entry suggests floor

6. Management Transition (Probability: LOW)

  • CEO Albert Manifold transitioning to Jim Mintern
  • Manifold has been exceptional; succession uncertainty
  • Mitigation: Mintern is internal (CFO); culture appears strong

Pre-Mortem: Most Likely Failure Mode

Scenario: The stock declines 25-35% during the next recession (2027-2028) as earnings fall 15-20% and the multiple compresses from 24x to 18x. This would bring the price to $85-95. Patient investors who bought at $122 would underperform for 2-3 years before recovery.

Phase 2: Financial Analysis

Profitability Metrics

Metric 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 Verdict
Revenue ($B) 34.4 31.8 29.1 27.8 25.7 Steady growth
Gross Margin 35.7% 34.2% 31.6% 29.5% 29.2% Expanding
Operating Margin 13.8% 12.8% 11.0% 10.1% 9.3% Expanding
Net Margin 9.7% 9.4% 7.7% 7.1% 6.3% Expanding
ROE 16.0% 16.1% 13.4% 12.3% 10.9% Above threshold

Assessment: Excellent margin expansion (+450 bps operating margin over 5 years) demonstrates pricing power and operational improvements. ROE now above Buffett's 15% threshold.

Balance Sheet Strength

Metric 2024 Assessment
Total Debt $14.8B Elevated but manageable
Net Debt $11.2B 1.7x EBITDA
D/E Ratio 1.28x Moderate leverage
Cash $3.6B Solid liquidity
Interest Coverage 8x+ Comfortable

Assessment: Leverage is higher than ideal (Buffett prefers D/E < 1.0) but well within bounds for a stable, asset-heavy business. Net debt/EBITDA of 1.7x is conservative for the industry.

Cash Flow Quality

Metric 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020
Operating CF ($B) 4.86 4.60 4.10 3.80 3.50
CapEx ($B) 2.49 1.65 1.50 1.40 1.30
FCF ($B) 2.37 2.95 2.60 2.40 2.20
Dividends ($B) 1.65 1.35 1.20 1.10 1.00

Owner Earnings Calculation (2024):

  • Net Income: $3.34B
  • Add: D&A: $1.80B
  • Less: Maintenance CapEx (est. 60% of total): $1.49B
  • Owner Earnings: ~$3.65B
  • At $81.8B market cap: 4.5% Owner Earnings Yield

Assessment: Strong cash generation with FCF covering dividends 1.4x. Elevated CapEx in 2024 reflects growth investments (capacity expansion for IIJA demand). Cash conversion consistently >80% of EBITDA.

Valuation Analysis

Current Metrics:

  • P/E (TTM): 24.4x
  • P/E (Forward): 19.9x
  • EV/EBITDA: 13.3x
  • P/B: 3.51x
  • FCF Yield: 2.9%
  • Owner Earnings Yield: 4.5%

Historical Context:

  • 5-year average P/E: ~18x
  • Current premium to history: ~35%

DCF Valuation (10-Year):

  • Base Case: 8% FCF growth for 5 years, 4% thereafter, 10% discount rate
  • Fair Value: ~$105-115 per share
  • Current price implies ~9-10% FCF growth perpetuity

Relative Valuation:

  • Vulcan Materials (VMC): P/E 42x - CRH cheaper but VMC is pure-play aggregates
  • Martin Marietta (MLM): P/E 28x - CRH cheaper
  • Holcim: P/E 12x - CRH premium justified by U.S. exposure

Assessment: CRH is priced for excellence. The valuation is not outrageous for the quality, but there is no margin of safety. A 10-15% pullback would make this attractive; a 20-25% pullback would make it compelling.

Phase 3: Moat Analysis

Business Model

CRH operates as an integrated building materials company with four key segments:

  1. Americas Materials Solutions (45% of EBITDA): Aggregates, cement, asphalt, readymix
  2. Americas Building Solutions (30%): Infrastructure products, utility infrastructure, outdoor living
  3. International Solutions (25%): Europe and Australia materials and products

The company has strategically shifted toward "solutions" rather than commodities - providing integrated offerings that bundle materials with services, installation, and logistics.

Moat Sources

1. Local Scale Monopolies (WIDE MOAT)

The Aggregates Moat: Aggregates (crushed stone, sand, gravel) cannot be transported economically beyond ~50 miles due to weight/value ratio. CRH has:

  • 700+ quarries/mines in the U.S.
  • #1 or #2 position in most local markets
  • Irreplaceable permitted reserves (new permits take 5-10+ years)

This creates natural local monopolies with pricing power. Once you own the quarry in an area, competitors cannot economically enter.

NIMBY Protection: Permitting new aggregate sites is nearly impossible in developed areas due to:

  • Environmental reviews (5-10 years)
  • Community opposition (NIMBY)
  • Water/air quality regulations
  • Truck traffic concerns

Existing reserves appreciate in value as replacements become unavailable.

2. Vertical Integration (NARROW-TO-WIDE MOAT)

CRH controls the full value chain:

  • Upstream: Aggregates, cement, limestone
  • Midstream: Asphalt plants, ready-mix plants
  • Downstream: Paving, precast, infrastructure products

This integration provides:

  • Cost advantages (10-15% vs. independents)
  • Quality control
  • Customer lock-in through solutions bundles
  • Counter-cyclical margins (when prices fall, integrated players capture more margin)

3. Scale Advantages (NARROW MOAT)

As the largest player in the industry:

  • Procurement leverage (equipment, energy, raw materials)
  • Shared services efficiency
  • Best practices transfer across 3,000+ locations
  • Access to best acquisition targets

4. Switching Costs (NARROW MOAT)

For large infrastructure projects:

  • Contractors prefer single-source suppliers (simplicity)
  • Long-term relationships with DOTs and municipalities
  • Pre-qualification requirements favor established players
  • Solutions bundling increases stickiness

Moat Durability

Positive Indicators:

  • Consistent pricing power (7th consecutive year of positive pricing in Europe)
  • Margin expansion through cycle
  • 10 consecutive years of margin improvement
  • Acquisitions at reasonable multiples

Concerns:

  • Cement is somewhat commoditized
  • European exposure to residential weakness
  • Cyclicality can temporarily overwhelm moat

Moat Rating: WIDE (4/5)

The aggregates-based local monopoly moat is as durable as any in business. The question is whether the entire company deserves a "wide moat" rating given some commodity exposure. On balance, the integrated model and local dominance justify a wide moat assessment.

Phase 4: Decision Synthesis

Investment Thesis

CRH is a high-quality compounder benefiting from a once-in-a-generation U.S. infrastructure investment cycle. The business has irreplaceable assets (quarries, permits), proven management, and a long runway for capital deployment.

Bull Case ($150+, 3-5 years):

  • IIJA spending accelerates 2026-2030
  • Pricing power continues (+5-8% annually)
  • M&A adds $1-2B EBITDA
  • Multiple expands to 15-16x EBITDA
  • EPS reaches $8+ by 2028

Base Case ($130-140, 3-5 years):

  • Steady IIJA deployment
  • Mid-single-digit organic growth
  • Multiple stable at 12-13x EBITDA
  • 10-12% annual returns

Bear Case ($85-95, if recession):

  • Economic slowdown hits non-res and residential
  • IIJA spending slows due to budget pressures
  • Earnings decline 15-20%
  • Multiple compresses to 18x P/E

Position Sizing

Given the lack of margin of safety at current prices:

  • At $122: 0% new position (WAIT)
  • At $100-110: 2-3% position (ACCUMULATE)
  • At $85-95: 4-5% position (STRONG BUY)

Entry Prices

Level Price P/E Rationale
Strong Buy $85 17x 30% margin of safety to fair value
Accumulate $100 20x Fair value for quality business
Hold Zone $100-130 20-26x Fairly valued; own but don't add
Sell/Trim $145+ 29x+ Optimism fully priced

Catalysts

Positive:

  • IIJA spending acceleration
  • Interest rate cuts boosting residential
  • Accretive acquisitions
  • Continued margin expansion

Negative:

  • Recession fears
  • Federal budget battles
  • Management transition stumble
  • Acquisition integration issues

Comparison to Klarman's Entry

Seth Klarman reportedly initiated his position around $115-120 in late 2025. His willingness to pay near current prices suggests:

  1. He sees longer runway than typical value investors
  2. Quality commands premium in his framework
  3. The infrastructure thesis is central to his macro view

However, Klarman can afford to be wrong on timing with his AUM. Individual investors need more margin of safety.

Final Verdict

Recommendation: WAIT

Quality Grade: A-

CRH is an exceptional business that I want to own, but not at any price. The current valuation of 24x earnings prices in excellent execution and multi-year infrastructure tailwinds.

Action:

  • Set price alerts at $100 (Accumulate) and $85 (Strong Buy)
  • Monitor quarterly for execution issues
  • Be ready to act during market dislocations

The patient investor's path: Wait for Mr. Market to offer this wonderful business at a fair price. The opportunity will come - it always does.

Appendix: Key Data Sources

  • AlphaVantage MCP: Financial statements, company overview
  • Q3 2024 Earnings Call Transcript
  • Q2 2024 Earnings Call Transcript
  • SEC filings (20-F)
  • Company investor presentations

Analysis prepared following the Buffett-Munger-Klarman framework. Primary sources only; no analyst reports used.