Executive Summary
Investment Thesis (3 Sentences)
Endesa is Spain's largest electric utility with a regulated distribution network serving 22 million people and 10+ million customers, providing predictable cash flows and defensive characteristics. The company delivered exceptional 2024 results (net income +154%) as energy markets normalized post-crisis, with strong deleveraging (1.8x net debt/EBITDA) and dividend growth (+32%). While trading at fair value (~17x P/E) with limited upside, the 4.3% yield and regulated utility profile make it a reasonable income holding, though Enel's 70% control limits minority shareholder influence.
Key Metrics Dashboard
| Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Price | âŽ30.65 | - |
| P/E (2024) | 17.2x | Fair for utility |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.9x | Reasonable |
| Dividend Yield | 4.3% | Attractive |
| Net Debt/EBITDA | 1.8x | Conservative |
| EBITDA Margin | 24.8% | Strong |
| Free Float | ~30% | Limited liquidity |
Decision & Sizing
| Decision | Rationale |
|---|---|
| HOLD (Currently Owned at 14.95%) | Fair value, collect dividend income |
| Position Size | Slightly overweight - consider trimming toward 10-12% |
Primary Catalyst & Timeline
- Catalyst: Continued energy transition + potential regulatory clarity on grid remuneration (2025-2026)
- Timeline: Dividend payment July 2025; regulatory update expected H1 2025
PHASE 0: Opportunity Identification (Klarman)
Why Does This Opportunity Exist?
| Opportunity Source | Present? | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Forced selling | No | - |
| Complexity/stigma | Partial | Energy sector complexity, regulatory uncertainty |
| Institutional constraints | No | Large cap, index constituent |
| Temporary operational problem | Resolved | 2023 was impacted by energy crisis; 2024 normalized |
| Market overreaction | No | Stock up +45% YTD, market has recognized recovery |
| Neglect | No | Well-covered by analysts |
Assessment: The opportunity was primarily due to the temporary energy market dislocation in 2022-2023. The market has now largely recognized the recovery (stock +45% YTD), reducing the opportunity. Current valuation is fair, not cheap.
PHASE 1: Risk Analysis (Inversion Thinking)
"All I want to know is where I'm going to die, so I'll never go there." - Munger
Top 3 Ways This Investment Could Fail
1. Regulatory Risk (Probability: 30% | Impact: -25%)
- Risk: Spanish government changes regulatory framework unfavorably
- Mechanism: Distribution remuneration cuts, windfall taxes, price caps
- Historical Evidence: Spain has history of retroactive regulatory changes (2013-2014 cuts)
- Recent Example: 1.2% extraordinary levy in 2023-2024 (now expired)
- Mitigation: Enel's political influence; Spain needs investment for energy transition
- Expected Loss: 30% Ã 25% = 7.5%
2. Enel Control Risk (Probability: 20% | Impact: -20%)
- Risk: Enel extracts value at expense of minority shareholders
- Mechanism: Related party transactions, unfavorable dividends, asset transfers
- Historical Evidence: Some concerns about intercompany arrangements
- Mitigation: Listed company with regulatory oversight; Enel needs capital markets access
- Expected Loss: 20% Ã 20% = 4%
3. Energy Transition Execution Risk (Probability: 25% | Impact: -30%)
- Risk: Fails to execute renewables transition competitively
- Mechanism: Stranded thermal assets, higher capex than planned, technology shifts
- Current Status: 47% renewable capacity, targeting significant expansion
- Mitigation: Already well-positioned vs peers; regulated distribution provides buffer
- Expected Loss: 25% Ã 30% = 7.5%
Bear Case Summary (Short Thesis)
"Endesa is a captive subsidiary of Enel with 70% control, trading at fair value with no margin of safety. Spain's regulatory history is hostile to utilities - expect future windfall taxes and rate cuts. The 2024 results are peak earnings as energy prices normalize lower. Minority shareholders get the dividend scraps while Enel controls the strategic direction. At 17x earnings with limited growth, you're paying full price for a utility with governance discount deserved."
Inversion Questions
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| How could this lose 50%+ permanently? | Major regulatory overhaul + energy transition failure + Enel value extraction |
| Non-price sell triggers? | Dividend cut >30%; Enel proposes squeeze-out; new windfall tax imposed |
| 3-sentence bear case? | See above |
| Can I state bear case better than bears? | Yes - bear case is valid but Spain needs Endesa for energy security |
PHASE 2: Financial Analysis
Return Metrics
ROE Analysis (5-Year)
| Year | Net Income (âŽM) | Equity (âŽM)* | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1,888 | ~12,000 | ~16% |
| 2023 | 742 | ~11,000 | ~7% |
| 2022 | 2,541 | ~11,500 | ~22% |
| 2021 | 1,902 | ~11,000 | ~17% |
| 2020 | 1,394 | ~10,500 | ~13% |
*Estimated
Normalized ROE: ~14-15% (excluding 2023 extraordinary impacts)
Owner Earnings Calculation (2024)
Net Earnings: âŽ1,888M
+ Depreciation/Amortization: ~âŽ1,800M (estimated)
- Maintenance CapEx: ~âŽ1,200M (estimated)
- Working Capital Changes: ~âŽ200M (estimated)
= Owner Earnings: ~âŽ2,300M
Owner Earnings per Share = âŽ2,300M / 1,058.75M = âŽ2.17
Valuation Trinity
1. Asset Value (Regulated Utility Approach)
For regulated utilities, Regulatory Asset Base (RAB) is key:
Estimated RAB: ~âŽ20-25B (distribution + generation)
RAB multiple: 1.0-1.3x typical for Spanish utilities
Implied Equity Value: âŽ20-25B à 1.2 - âŽ9.3B net debt = ~âŽ15-21B
Per Share: âŽ14-20
Assessment: Current price âŽ30.65 trades at premium to asset value - typical for quality utilities
2. Going Concern Value (DCF Conservative)
Assumptions:
- Owner Earnings Year 0: âŽ2,300M
- Growth Years 1-5: 2% (regulated, inflation-linked)
- Growth Years 6-10: 1.5%
- Terminal Growth: 1%
- Discount Rate: 8% (EUR utility)
DCF Value (10-year):
Year 1-5: âŽ2,300M growing at 2% = âŽ2,346, âŽ2,393, âŽ2,441, âŽ2,490, âŽ2,540
Year 6-10: Growing at 1.5%
Terminal Value = âŽ2,700M à 1.01 / (0.08 - 0.01) = âŽ38,957M
PV of Cash Flows + Terminal = ~âŽ11,200M + ~âŽ18,000M = âŽ29,200M
Intrinsic Value = âŽ29,200M / 1,058.75M = âŽ27.58 per share
Margin of Safety: (âŽ27.58 - âŽ30.65) / âŽ27.58 = -11% (Premium to DCF)
3. Dividend Discount Model (Utility Appropriate)
Current Dividend: âŽ1.32
Dividend Growth Rate: 3% (long-term)
Required Return: 8%
DDM Value = âŽ1.32 à 1.03 / (0.08 - 0.03) = âŽ27.19 per share
4. Relative Valuation
| Metric | ELE | European Utilities Avg | Premium/Discount |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 17.2x | 12-16x | Slight premium |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.9x | 7-9x | In-line |
| Dividend Yield | 4.3% | 4-6% | In-line |
| Net Debt/EBITDA | 1.8x | 3-4x | Conservative |
Assessment: Trading in line to slight premium vs peers on P/E, justified by strong balance sheet.
Valuation Summary
| Method | Value/Share | vs âŽ30.65 | MOS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset Value (RAB) | âŽ14-20 | Premium | n/a |
| DCF (Conservative) | âŽ27.58 | +11% premium | -11% |
| DDM | âŽ27.19 | +13% premium | -13% |
| EV/EBITDA (8x) | âŽ31.50 | -3% discount | 3% |
| Owner Earnings à 12 | âŽ26.04 | +18% premium | -18% |
| Owner Earnings à 14 | âŽ30.38 | +1% premium | -1% |
Intrinsic Value Estimate: âŽ27-30 per share Current Price vs IV: Trading at or slightly above fair value
PHASE 3: Moat Analysis
Moat Sources
| Moat Type | Strength | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Regulated Monopoly | HIGH | Distribution network is regulated monopoly |
| Scale Advantages | MODERATE | Largest utility in Spain, cost advantages |
| Switching Costs | LOW | Retail customers can switch suppliers |
| Network Effects | LOW | Limited |
| Intangible Assets | MODERATE | Licenses, permits, regulatory relationships |
Moat Quantification
Distribution Network (Strongest Moat):
- 320,329 km of network - cannot be replicated
- Serves 22 million people in regulated territories
- Remuneration set by regulator - predictable returns
- ~40% of EBITDA from regulated distribution
Generation Assets:
- 21,449 MW capacity - significant but not unique
- 47% renewable - growing
- Nuclear assets provide baseload (but aging)
- Competitive in wholesale market
Moat Durability Assessment
| Threat | Severity (1-5) | Timeline | Company Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regulatory change | 4 | Ongoing | Political engagement, essential service |
| Distributed generation | 3 | 10+ years | Investing in solar, storage |
| Technology disruption | 2 | 15+ years | Transitioning to renewables |
| New entrants | 1 | Low | Regulated monopoly protected |
| Customer switching | 2 | Ongoing | Focus on service quality |
10-Year Moat Trajectory: Stable to slightly widening (distribution monopoly durable)
Moat Rating: MODERATE-HIGH
Distribution monopoly is very strong; generation competitive but well-positioned. Overall moat is durable for utility sector.
PHASE 4: Management & Incentive Analysis
Parent Company Control
| Aspect | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Controller | Enel SpA (70.1% stake) |
| Control Type | Strategic management control |
| CEO Appointment | Appointed by Enel board |
| Strategy Alignment | Aligned with Enel Group strategy |
Capital Allocation (2024)
| Use of FCF | Amount | % | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividends | âŽ1,397M | 38% | 70% payout ratio policy |
| Debt Repayment | âŽ1,100M | 30% | Deleveraging priority |
| CapEx | âŽ2,057M | 55% | Renewable investment |
| FCF Generated | ~âŽ3,600M | - | Strong conversion |
Note: FCF exceeds uses due to working capital benefits
Enel Relationship Assessment
Positives:
- Strategic backing from major European utility
- Access to Enel's technology and expertise
- Credit strength benefits from parent
- Aligned on energy transition
Concerns:
- Minority shareholders have limited influence
- Potential for value extraction via related party transactions
- Dividend policy set by Enel's needs
- CEO serves Enel's interests first
Insider Activity
Limited visibility - Enel CEO recently increased personal stake (Nov 2024)
PHASE 5: Catalyst Analysis
Potential Catalysts
| Catalyst | Type | Timeline | Probability | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regulatory clarity on grid remuneration | External | H1 2025 | 60% | Moderate |
| Continued earnings normalization | Operational | Ongoing | 80% | Priced in |
| Renewable capacity additions | Operational | 2025-2027 | 70% | Moderate |
| Dividend increase | Internal | July 2025 | 60% | Modest |
| Potential minority squeeze-out | External | Low prob. | 10% | High |
No Strong Near-Term Catalyst
The 2024 recovery is already reflected in the +45% YTD price move. Future catalysts are incremental rather than transformative.
PHASE 6: Decision Synthesis
Graham's 7 Criteria Assessment
| # | Criterion | Test | ELE | Pass? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adequate Size | Revenue > âŽ100M | âŽ21.3B revenue | â |
| 2 | Financial Condition | Strong balance sheet | 1.8x leverage | â |
| 3 | Earnings Stability | Positive 10 years | Some volatility | â ïļ |
| 4 | Dividend Record | 20+ years | Yes | â |
| 5 | Earnings Growth | 33% over 10 years | Flat to modest | â |
| 6 | Moderate P/E | P/E < 15 | 17.2x | â |
| 7 | Moderate P/B | P/B < 1.5 | ~2.7x | â |
Graham Quality: 3.5/7 - Does not meet strict Graham criteria (P/E and P/B too high)
Buffett Quality Criteria
| Criterion | Assessment | Pass? |
|---|---|---|
| Explain in one sentence | "Spain's largest utility - generates and distributes electricity" | â |
| ROE consistently > 15%? | ~14-15% normalized, volatile | â ïļ |
| Management skin in game? | Controlled by Enel, limited alignment | â ïļ |
| Identifiable moat? | Distribution monopoly + scale | â |
| Consistent FCF? | Yes, ~âŽ3B+ annually | â |
Buffett Quality: 3.5/5 - Good quality utility
Megatrend Resilience Score
| Megatrend | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| China Tech Superiority | 0 | Neutral - domestic utility |
| Europe Degrowth | -1 | Spain economic exposure |
| American Protectionism | 0 | Neutral - no US exposure |
| AI/Automation | +1 | Data center electricity demand |
| Demographics/Aging | 0 | Neutral |
| Fiscal Crisis | -1 | Government may tax utilities |
| Energy Transition | +1 | Positioned for renewables |
Total Score: 0 | Tier: T3 (Adaptable)
Expected Return with Probability Tree
| Scenario | Probability | 5-Year Return | Weighted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bull (regulatory support, faster growth) | 15% | +60% | +9% |
| Base (stable operations, 4% yield + modest growth) | 55% | +35% | +19.3% |
| Bear (regulatory pressure, flat earnings) | 25% | +10% | +2.5% |
| Disaster (major adverse regulation) | 5% | -30% | -1.5% |
| Expected | 100% | +29.3% |
5-Year Expected Return: +29% (~5.3% annualized + 4% dividend = ~9-10% total return)
Position Sizing
Current position: 14.95% of portfolio
Assessment: Position is overweight for a:
- Fair value / slight premium stock
- Controlled subsidiary (governance discount warranted)
- Single-country utility (concentration risk)
- T3 megatrend tier
Recommendation: Consider trimming toward 10-12% allocation
Price Targets & Recommendation
âââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ
â INVESTMENT RECOMMENDATION â
âââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââĪ
â Company: Endesa SA Ticker: ELE â
â Current Price: âŽ30.65 Date: December 24, 2024 â
âââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââĪ
â VALUATION SUMMARY â
â âââââââââââââââââââââââââââŽââââââââââââââŽââââââââââââââââââââââ â
â â Method â Value/Share â vs Current Price â â
â âââââââââââââââââââââââââââžââââââââââââââžââââââââââââââââââââââĪ â
â â DCF (Conservative) â âŽ27.58 â -11% (premium) â â
â â DDM (3% growth) â âŽ27.19 â -13% (premium) â â
â â EV/EBITDA (8x) â âŽ31.50 â 3% MOS â â
â â Owner Earnings (12x) â âŽ26.04 â -18% (premium) â â
â â Owner Earnings (14x) â âŽ30.38 â -1% (premium) â â
â âââââââââââââââââââââââââââīââââââââââââââīââââââââââââââââââââââ â
â â
â INTRINSIC VALUE ESTIMATE: âŽ28 (rounded weighted average) â
â CURRENT MARGIN OF SAFETY: -9% (trading at premium) â
âââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââĪ
â RECOMMENDATION: [ ] BUY [x] HOLD [ ] SELL [ ] WAIT â
â Consider TRIM to reduce concentration â
âââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââĪ
â BUY PRICE (Strong): âŽ19.60 (30% below IV) â
â ACCUMULATE PRICE: âŽ22.40 (20% below IV) â
â FAIR VALUE: âŽ28.00 (Intrinsic Value) â
â TAKE PROFITS PRICE: âŽ33.60 (20% above IV) â
â SELL PRICE: âŽ42.00 (50% above IV) â
âââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââĪ
â POSITION SIZE: 14.95% (current) - consider trim to 10-12% â
â CATALYST: Regulatory clarity H1 2025; dividend continuation â
â PRIMARY RISK: Regulatory intervention; Enel control â
â SELL TRIGGER: Dividend cut >30%; new windfall tax; P/E >22x â
âââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ
Explicit Sell Triggers
- Thesis Break: Spain imposes permanent windfall tax or materially cuts distribution remuneration
- Moat Erosion: Distribution monopoly threatened by regulatory change
- Governance Failure: Enel proposes transaction clearly unfavorable to minorities
- Valuation: Price exceeds âŽ42 (50% above fair value)
- Financial: Net debt/EBITDA exceeds 4x; dividend cut >30%
What I Will NOT Sell On
- Short-term energy price volatility
- Temporary regulatory noise (elections, political posturing)
- Market panic unrelated to company fundamentals
- Minor earnings miss in single quarter
Monitoring Metrics
| Metric | Current | Warning | Action if Breached |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Debt/EBITDA | 1.8x | >3.5x | Review thesis |
| Dividend/Share | âŽ1.32 | <âŽ1.00 | Concern |
| EBITDA Margin | 24.8% | <18% | Watch closely |
| Renewable % | 47% | <40% | Transition concern |
| Distribution EBITDA | ~40% | <30% | Moat weakening |
Psychology Check
| Bias | Check | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Endowment effect | Holding because I own it? | â ïļ Yes - position is large |
| Anchoring | Am I anchored to entry price? | Possible |
| Social proof | Others own utilities? | Neutral |
| Confirmation bias | Ignoring governance concerns? | Addressed in analysis |
Munger's Final Test
- Circle of Competence: Can explain - utility that generates and distributes electricity in Spain
- Variant Perception: No strong variant view - stock is fairly valued
- Humility Check: If regulatory environment turns hostile, thesis is challenged
- Inversion Final: If -50% tomorrow, would I add cautiously (regulated utility likely to survive)
Sources Used & Data Extracted
API Data Retrieved
| Source | Data |
|---|---|
| EODHD | 5 years daily prices (1,788 obs), dividend dates |
Web Sources Consulted
| Source | Data Extracted |
|---|---|
| Endesa Results 2024 | Revenue, EBITDA, Net Income, debt, guidance |
| Endesa Results 2023 | Prior year financials |
| companiesmarketcap.com | Historical revenue, shares outstanding |
| Renewables Now | 2024 results summary |
| Simply Wall St | Ownership breakdown |
| Enel Key Facts 2024 | Ownership structure (70.1%) |
Conclusion
Endesa is a quality regulated utility trading at fair value. The 2024 recovery was impressive but is now priced in. As an income holding with a 4.3% yield and defensive characteristics, it's acceptable to hold. However, the current 14.95% allocation is arguably too concentrated for a controlled subsidiary with governance limitations.
Final Verdict: HOLD. Collect dividends. Consider trimming to 10-12% allocation on strength (above âŽ33).
Analysis completed December 24, 2024