Back to Portfolio
ITS

ITS

$0.955 0.2B market cap 22 February 2026
Info-Tech Systems Ltd. ITS BUFFETT / MUNGER / KLARMAN SUMMARY
1 SNAPSHOT
Price$0.955
Market Cap0.2B
2 BUSINESS

Info-Tech Systems is a genuinely high-quality SaaS business with best-in-class unit economics: 86% gross margins, 28% net margins, 91% customer retention, and cash-generative advance-payment model. It is the market leader in Singapore and Malaysia SME cloud HRMS with 23,000+ customers and 850,000 active users. Growth vectors include Info-Tech Accounting Software (tripling annually), Academy training, CRM/POS products, and geographic expansion. However, the IPO at S$0.87 was priced to reward founders (89% NAV dilution to new investors), and the current price of S$0.955 (~20x earnings) provides insufficient margin of safety for a small-cap SaaS business in a competitive market with AI disruption risk. This is a WAIT -- buy at S$0.80 or below for adequate margin of safety.

3 MOAT NARROW

Switching costs from embedded HRMS/payroll data and workflows, plus regulatory localization (CPF, EPF, MPF, PF compliance) across 4 countries. 91% customer retention rate.

4 MANAGEMENT
CEO: Setin Subramanian Dilip Babu

Good - asset-light model, strong cash generation, min 50% payout. Risk is stated interest in M&A which could destroy value.

5 ECONOMICS
34.1% Op Margin
35% ROIC
309.9% ROE
19.85x P/E
0.017B FCF
-665% Debt/EBITDA
6 VALUATION
FCF Yield6.9%
DCF Range1 - 1.3

Fairly valued to slightly overvalued; 17% below DCF estimate but limited MOS

7 MUNGER INVERSION
Kill Event Severity P() E[Loss]
AI-native HRMS disruption from well-funded global competitors (Zoho, Xero, BambooHR) or new entrants HIGH - -
Government grant dependency -- Singapore PSG subsidizes up to 50% of SME first-year costs; withdrawal would hurt acquisition MED - -
8 KLARMAN LENS
Downside Case

AI-native HRMS disruption from well-funded global competitors (Zoho, Xero, BambooHR) or new entrants

Why Market Right

IPO lock-up expiry could trigger founder share sales; Growth deceleration in core Singapore HRMS market (market penetration nearing limits)

Catalysts

Accounting Software revenue tripling annually -- could become significant revenue driver; Academy expansion to Malaysia; 12 WSQ courses with 4,000+ registrations; CRM and POS product launches would expand TAM and deepen customer relationships; Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone creating cross-border HR demand

9 VERDICT WAIT
B+ Quality Strong - S$29.7M cash with no bank debt; only S$3.5M lease liabilities. SaaS model generates cash upfront via advance subscriptions.
Strong Buy$0.69
Buy$0.8
Fair Value$1.3

Monitor for price decline to S$0.80 (accumulate) or S$0.69 (strong buy). Watch FY2025 results closely.

🧠 ULTRATHINK Deep Philosophical Analysis

Info-Tech Systems -- The Ultrathink

The Core Question: Is This a Franchise or a Feature?

There is a critical distinction in technology investing between a company that has built a franchise and one that has built a feature. A franchise has the power to charge for value over time, to deepen customer relationships, and to widen its competitive position as it scales. A feature, no matter how well-executed, is always one product cycle away from irrelevance.

Info-Tech Systems sits uncomfortably between these two categories.

On the franchise side: 23,000 customers, 850,000 active users, 91% retention, regulatory compliance engines for four countries, and a growing suite of products (HRMS, accounting, training academy, job portal). The business generates 86% gross margins and converts virtually all EBITDA into free cash flow. It has been profitable every year since at least 2022, growing revenue at 19% annually while expanding margins. These are the characteristics of a franchise.

On the feature side: this is fundamentally payroll and HR administration software for small businesses. It is not a platform that generates network effects. It does not own distribution in the way a payments network or a marketplace does. And the competitive barriers, while real (switching costs, regulatory localization), are not insurmountable for a well-funded entrant.

Munger would press the question further: "What is the one thing that, if true, would make this investment obviously wrong?" The answer is clear: if AI-native HR tools make HRMS commodity software within five years, Info-Tech's moat evaporates regardless of its current market position. A tool like ChatGPT, integrated into a lightweight HR interface, could potentially handle payroll calculations, leave management, and regulatory compliance -- all of Info-Tech's core modules -- at near-zero marginal cost.

Moat Meditation: The Localization Paradox

The most interesting aspect of Info-Tech's competitive position is what I call the "localization paradox." The company's moat is strongest precisely where its market is smallest. Singapore has unique CPF rules, IRAS Auto-Inclusion requirements, and MOM reporting obligations. Malaysia has EPF, SOCSO, and EIS. Hong Kong has MPF. India has PF and ESI. Each country requires bespoke compliance logic that must be updated as regulations change.

This localization creates genuine switching costs. An SME that has configured its payroll deductions, leave policies, and attendance rules within Info-Tech's system faces real cost and risk to migrate elsewhere. The most compelling evidence is the retention data: customers who leave do so because their businesses close, not because they find a better alternative.

But here is the paradox: this same localization limits the addressable market. Info-Tech cannot simply replicate itself in Japan, Germany, or Brazil without rebuilding significant portions of its compliance engine. The combined SME market for its four countries is US$3.3 billion, growing at 7-12% annually. This is meaningful but not enormous. A $44 million revenue company has roughly a 1% share of a $3.3 billion addressable market -- plenty of runway, but the market itself is not so large that it attracts the most fearsome competition.

The question is whether the localization advantage deepens faster than AI commoditizes it. If Info-Tech can add CRM, POS, and LMS modules to its platform before a global competitor localizes an AI-native solution, the switching costs compound. If it cannot, the localization advantage becomes a relic of a pre-AI compliance era.

The Owner's Mindset: Would Buffett Hold This for 20 Years?

Buffett has said his ideal holding period is "forever," but he has also been clear that this applies only to businesses with durable competitive advantages where management acts as stewards of shareholder capital.

On the positive side, Info-Tech is exactly the type of business Buffett philosophically admires. It is a toll-road: every SME in Singapore with more than a handful of employees needs HR software, and Info-Tech collects a recurring subscription. It has pricing power (retention rates are rising). It requires minimal capital (asset-light SaaS). And it generates far more cash than it needs to fund growth.

The concern is durability. Buffett famously avoided technology investments for decades because technology advantages tend to be transient. He made an exception for Apple because he viewed it as a consumer brand, not a technology company. Info-Tech is much more clearly a technology company. Its advantage is its software, and software can be replicated, improved upon, or made obsolete.

Moreover, Buffett demands that a business be understandable and predictable over a 20-year horizon. Can we predict with confidence that SMEs in Singapore will be using Info-Tech's HRMS in 2046? The honest answer is: probably not with confidence. The HR software landscape in 2046 will likely look nothing like it does today. The question is whether Info-Tech will evolve with it.

The founder's 60% ownership stake is encouraging -- his incentives are aligned. But succession is a real concern for a 20-year holding period. There is no disclosed succession plan, and the company's culture appears deeply tied to its two co-founders.

Risk Inversion: How This Business Could Be Destroyed

Three scenarios could permanently impair Info-Tech's value:

Scenario 1: The "Free HR" Disruption. A large platform company (Google, Microsoft, or a well-funded startup) offers free or near-free AI-native HR software as a loss leader to capture SME data and upsell other services. This has precedent: Google Workspace and free accounting tools from banks have disrupted paid software in adjacent categories. If HRMS becomes a feature of a broader SME operating system rather than a standalone product, Info-Tech's pricing power collapses.

Scenario 2: The Singapore Government Policy Shift. Info-Tech benefits disproportionately from the Productivity Solutions Grant, which subsidizes up to 50% of first-year customer costs. This grant makes Info-Tech's effective price to SMEs much lower than its headline price. If the grant is discontinued, demand from new customers could fall sharply, and the company would face the choice between lower growth or lower margins.

Scenario 3: The Founder Exit. If Peter Lee sells a significant portion of his 60% stake within the first few years post-IPO, it could signal that the founder believes the best days are behind the company. A founder selling 10-20% of the company in an IPO is normal. Selling another large tranche within 2-3 years would be concerning.

Valuation Philosophy: Is the Price Justified by the Quality?

At S$0.955 per share and approximately 20x trailing earnings, the market is pricing Info-Tech as a steady growth business. For a company growing revenue at 15% and earnings at 18%, a 20x multiple implies the market expects growth to continue but does not anticipate acceleration.

The philosophical question for a value investor is whether this price offers an adequate reward for the risks. Twenty times earnings is not expensive for a SaaS business by Silicon Valley standards -- Xero trades at 60x, Workday at 30x, BambooHR (private) likely at higher multiples. But these comparisons are misleading. Info-Tech is a S$247 million market cap company listed on the SGX, not a US-listed SaaS unicorn. Its liquidity, analyst coverage, and institutional ownership base are qualitatively different.

Klarman would ask: "Am I being paid to take the risk?" At 20x earnings with 17% upside to fair value, the answer is: barely. The expected return of roughly 5% annualized (base case) does not compensate for the possibility that the investment thesis breaks entirely (AI disruption, grant withdrawal, competitive entry).

Graham would observe that there is no margin of safety at this price. The Graham Number is meaningless for a SaaS business with minimal tangible assets, but the principle remains: you want to buy a dollar of value for substantially less than a dollar.

The Patient Investor's Path

The right approach to Info-Tech is patient observation. This is a company worth owning -- at the right price.

The ideal entry is during a moment of maximum pessimism: a disappointing quarterly result (likely the first hiccup after IPO), lock-up period selling, a broader SGX correction, or a technology sector rotation. At S$0.80, the stock would trade at approximately 16x trailing earnings with a 30% margin of safety to DCF value -- an adequate price for a 2% starter position.

At S$0.69, representing a strong buy level, the stock would trade at roughly 11x earnings -- a price that would adequately compensate for all identified risks and provide a genuine Klarman-style margin of safety.

The monitoring framework is straightforward: watch customer retention (must stay above 85%), revenue growth (must stay above 8%), and net margin (must stay above 20%). Any two of these three deteriorating simultaneously would be a thesis-breaking signal.

In the meantime, the patient investor does what Munger advises: sit on their hands and wait. The opportunity set in public markets is vast. There is no penalty for not swinging at this pitch today, and a meaningful reward for waiting for a better one tomorrow.

Executive Summary

Info-Tech Systems is the leading cloud-based SaaS HRMS and accounting software provider for SMEs in Singapore and Malaysia. Listed on the SGX Mainboard in July 2025 at S$0.87 per share, it is the first pure-play SaaS HRMS company on the SGX. The business has excellent unit economics: 86% gross margins, 28% net margins, recurring subscription revenue with 91% customer retention, and strong cash flow generation. However, the stock trades at ~20x trailing earnings for a S$44M revenue business, leaving limited margin of safety for value investors despite the high quality.

Investment Thesis in 3 Sentences: Info-Tech Systems is a genuinely high-quality SaaS business with strong competitive positioning in the Singapore/Malaysia SME HR software market, demonstrated by 19% revenue CAGR, 91% customer retention, and industry-leading margins. However, the IPO valuation at ~18x adjusted earnings and current price of ~20x TTM earnings prices in much of the growth, leaving insufficient margin of safety for disciplined value investors. This is a business to admire and monitor for a better entry price, not one to buy at current levels.

Key Metrics Dashboard

Metric FY2022 FY2023 FY2024
Revenue (S$M) 30.8 38.1 43.7
Revenue Growth - 23.4% 14.8%
Gross Profit Margin 86.0% 87.0% 85.6%
EBITDA Margin 34.7% 39.8% 38.9%
Net Profit (S$M) 7.2 10.5 12.3
Net Profit Margin 23.3% 27.6% 28.2%
Operating Cash Flow (S$M) 10.7 14.6 18.0
Cash & Equivalents (S$M) 11.8 17.8 29.7
Customers (HRMS) 16,100 19,800 22,800
Customer Retention Rate 87.0% 90.1% 91.0%
Annual Recurring Revenue (S$M) 13.8 17.0 21.6

PHASE 0: OPPORTUNITY IDENTIFICATION (Klarman)

Why Does This Opportunity Exist?

Short answer: It does not clearly exist. The stock is a recent IPO (July 2025) priced by sophisticated underwriters (OCBC, CGS International) who know the Singapore market well. The IPO was 14.4x oversubscribed on the public tranche and 5.5x on the placement. Cornerstone investors include Dymon Asia, Lion Global, Nikko Asset Management, and Maybank Asset Management -- these are not naive buyers.

Potential sources of opportunity (weak):

  1. Small-cap neglect: At S$247M market cap, this is too small for most institutional funds, and being a fresh IPO, may lack broad analyst coverage.
  2. Singapore market discount: SGX-listed tech companies generally trade at a discount to US-listed peers of similar quality.
  3. Pre-profit inflection misunderstanding: The accounting software, Academy, and Jobs Lah products are still early-stage and may be underappreciated by the market.

Counter-argument: The stock has actually traded up since IPO (S$0.87 to S$0.955), suggesting the market recognizes the quality. There is no forced selling, no complexity discount, and no temporary operational problem. This is a well-understood, well-promoted IPO.

Conclusion: No clear Klarman-style opportunity exists. Proceed with caution.


PHASE 1: RISK ANALYSIS (Inversion Thinking)

"All I want to know is where I'm going to die, so I'll never go there." -- Munger

1. Competitive Disruption Risk

Severity: MODERATE | Probability: 30% over 5 years

The SME HR and accounting software market is highly fragmented and competitive. Info-Tech competes against both global players (BambooHR, Gusto, Xero, Zoho) and local competitors. The prospectus itself identifies key competitive risks:

  • Existing competitors could increase market share through aggressive pricing, R&D, or acquisitions
  • New entrants could emerge, particularly AI-native HRMS providers
  • Enterprise-focused players (SAP SuccessFactors, Workday) could move downmarket to target SMEs

Mitigant: Info-Tech's localization (payroll compliance for Singapore CPF, Malaysia EPF, Hong Kong MPF, India PF) creates meaningful switching costs. The 91% retention rate supports this. Most non-renewals are due to business closure, not competitive loss.

2. Key Person Risk

Severity: HIGH | Probability: 15% over 5 years

The company is essentially a founder-led business. Mr. Lee Kim Heng Peter (Executive Chairman) and Mr. Setin Subramanian Dilip Babu (CEO) co-founded the company and have worked together for 19+ years. They were the Vendors in the IPO, selling existing shares. Post-IPO, Mr. Lee holds approximately 60.3% of shares. The business is deeply tied to their vision, relationships, and execution capability.

Mitigant: The co-founders have a 19-year track record of working together. The company has over 500 employees and appears to have professional management below the founders. Lock-up provisions apply post-IPO.

3. Valuation Risk (IPO Premium Erosion)

Severity: MODERATE-HIGH | Probability: 40% over 2 years

At ~20x TTM earnings for a S$44M revenue business growing at 15%, this is not cheap. The IPO was priced to sell, with significant dilution to new investors (89% dilution in NAV per share at IPO). If growth slows from the 19% CAGR to, say, 10-12%, the market may re-rate the stock downward.

4. Government Grant Dependency

Severity: MODERATE | Probability: 25% over 3 years

Info-Tech benefits significantly from Singapore government grants (Productivity Solutions Grant) that subsidize up to 50% of first-year costs for SME customers. The Academy also relies on WSQ (Workforce Singapore) funding. If these grants are reduced or eliminated, customer acquisition costs would increase and price sensitivity could intensify.

5. Technology Platform Risk (Microsoft Azure Dependency)

Severity: LOW-MODERATE | Probability: 10%

The entire cloud infrastructure runs on Microsoft Azure. Contract expires 31 December 2025 (likely renewed by now). Any significant Azure price increase would compress margins, as the company lacks price escalation clauses in customer contracts.

INVERSION SECTION

How could this investment lose 50%+ permanently?

  • Revenue growth stalls as Singapore market saturates; Malaysia/HK/India expansion fails
  • A well-funded competitor (Xero, Zoho, or a new AI-native player) offers free or much cheaper HRMS, triggering a price war
  • Government grants withdrawn, creating a demand cliff
  • Data breach or security incident destroys trust (the company handles sensitive employee/payroll data)
  • Founders exit; professional management fails to maintain culture and execution

If I were short this stock, my 3-sentence bear case: "Info-Tech is a small, single-product company trading at 20x earnings in a hyper-competitive, low-barrier market. Its ~10% Singapore market share gives it nowhere to hide when AI-native HRMS tools arrive offering free or near-free alternatives. The IPO was designed to reward the founders; new investors got 89% NAV dilution and are paying for growth that may never justify the premium."


PHASE 2: FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

Income Statement Analysis

(S$'000) FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 CAGR
Revenue 30,845 38,064 43,713 19.0%
HRMS Subscription 28,272 32,602 34,395 10.3%
Accounting Software 26 586 1,765 724%
Academy Training 0 1,509 3,252 n/a
Hardware 1,850 2,211 2,268 10.7%
Gross Profit 26,522 33,125 37,416 18.8%
Gross Margin 86.0% 87.0% 85.6%
Operating Profit 9,515 13,233 14,911 25.2%
Operating Margin 30.8% 34.8% 34.1%
Net Profit 7,185 10,487 12,339 31.1%
Net Margin 23.3% 27.6% 28.2%

Key observations:

  • 86% gross margins are extraordinary and characteristic of a pure SaaS business
  • HRMS subscription growth is slowing (10.3% CAGR) while newer products (Accounting Software, Academy) are driving incremental growth
  • Employee costs dominate the expense structure (across COGS, S&D, Admin, and R&D)
  • Effective tax rate of ~17% (Singapore's corporate tax rate)

Revenue Mix by Geography

Geography FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 % of Total
Singapore 24,666 29,344 32,830 75.1%
Malaysia 4,860 6,823 8,240 18.9%
Others (HK, India) 1,319 1,897 2,643 6.0%

Singapore still dominates with 75% of revenue. Malaysia at 19% is the key growth market (CAGR 30.2%).

Balance Sheet Analysis

(S$'000) FY2022 FY2023 FY2024
Cash & Equivalents 11,758 17,792 29,715
Total Current Assets 23,995 30,619 33,595
Total Assets 28,959 36,088 39,668
Contract Liabilities (Current) 19,841 21,673 23,458
Contract Liabilities (Non-Current) 599 1,077 2,107
Total Liabilities 28,157 31,733 35,686
Total Equity 802 4,355 3,982
Lease Liabilities 2,844 2,750 3,542

Critical Balance Sheet Features:

  • Negative working capital model: Contract liabilities (deferred revenue) of S$25.6M represent >50% of annual revenue collected in advance. This is the hallmark of a SaaS business -- customers pay upfront for 12-month subscriptions.
  • Asset-light: PP&E of only S$4.3M. Intangible assets nearly written off at S$213K.
  • Cash-rich: S$29.7M in cash vs. S$3.5M in lease liabilities (the only real debt). Net cash of ~S$26M.
  • Tiny equity base: Only S$4.0M in total equity pre-IPO, almost entirely retained earnings. This makes traditional ROE calculations misleading (ROE would be >300%).

Cash Flow Analysis

(S$'000) FY2022 FY2023 FY2024
Operating Cash Flow 10,686 14,550 18,026
Investing Cash Flow (10,978) (7,566) (3,071)
Financing Cash Flow (7,754) (1,068) (3,323)
Net Change in Cash (8,046) 5,916 11,632
  • FCF generation is excellent. OCF of S$18.0M in FY2024 with minimal capex requirements.
  • Free Cash Flow = ~S$17M (OCF minus maintenance capex of ~S$1M)
  • FCF/EBITDA = 1.0x -- virtually all EBITDA converts to cash
  • Investing activities in FY2022 included the purchase of the Singapore office; this has normalized.

Owner Earnings Calculation

Owner Earnings = Net Income + D&A - Maintenance CapEx - Working Capital Increases
               = 12,339 + 2,100 - 1,000 - 0 (WC is naturally funded by contract liabilities)
               = ~S$13,400

Note: Working capital is self-funding due to the advance-payment business model.

Valuation Trinity

1. Liquidation Value (Floor)

Net Current Asset Value = Current Assets - Total Liabilities
                       = 33,595 - 35,686
                       = -S$2,091 (Negative NCAV)

NCAV is negative because of the large contract liability balance. However, these are not real "debts" -- they represent revenue already collected that will be recognized over the subscription period. Adjusted for this:

Adjusted NCAV = Current Assets - (Total Liabilities - Contract Liabilities)
              = 33,595 - (35,686 - 25,565)
              = 33,595 - 10,121
              = S$23,474
NCAV per Share = S$23,474K / 258,780K shares = S$0.091

Tangible Book Value at IPO:

Post-IPO Equity = ~S$30M (S$4.0M + S$26M IPO proceeds)
TBV per share = S$30M / 258.78M shares = S$0.116

Liquidation value is essentially meaningless for a SaaS business -- the value is in the recurring revenue stream and customer relationships, not tangible assets.

2. Going Concern Value (DCF with Conservative Assumptions)

Assumptions:

  • Starting Owner Earnings: S$13.4M
  • Growth Rate Years 1-5: 12% (below recent 19% CAGR, reflecting maturation)
  • Growth Rate Years 6-10: 8%
  • Terminal Growth Rate: 3%
  • Discount Rate: 10% (reflecting Singapore market, small-cap risk)
Year Owner Earnings (S$K) PV Factor PV (S$K)
1 15,008 0.909 13,644
2 16,809 0.826 13,893
3 18,826 0.751 14,140
4 21,085 0.683 14,401
5 23,615 0.621 14,665
6 25,504 0.564 14,387
7 27,544 0.513 14,130
8 29,748 0.467 13,882
9 32,128 0.424 13,622
10 34,698 0.386 13,381
Terminal 510,971 0.386 197,235
Total S$337,380
Intrinsic Value per Share = S$337M / 258.78M shares = S$1.30
Current Price: S$0.955
Margin of Safety: (1.30 - 0.955) / 1.30 = 26.5%

Sensitivity Table:

Discount Rate / Growth (Yr 1-5) 10% Growth 12% Growth 15% Growth
8% Discount S$1.68 S$1.82 S$2.04
10% Discount S$1.21 S$1.30 S$1.45
12% Discount S$0.91 S$0.98 S$1.08

3. Private Market Value

SaaS businesses in Southeast Asia trade at 5-10x revenue in private markets (for profitable, growing businesses). Applying a conservative 5-7x revenue multiple:

Private Market Value = S$43.7M x 6x = S$262M
Per Share = S$262M / 258.78M = S$1.01

At 7x revenue: S$306M / 258.78M = S$1.18

4. Relative Valuation (Owner Earnings Multiple)

Owner Earnings per Share = S$13.4M / 258.78M = S$0.0518

At 15x: S$0.777
At 18x: S$0.932
At 20x: S$1.036
At 25x: S$1.295

Margin of Safety Summary

Valuation Method Value/Share vs S$0.955 MOS
NCAV (Adjusted) S$0.091 n/m n/m
DCF Conservative S$1.30 -26.5% 26.5%
Private Market (6x Rev) S$1.01 +5.6% -5.6%
Owner Earnings x 15 S$0.78 +22.4% -22.4%
Owner Earnings x 20 S$1.04 -8.2% 8.2%
Owner Earnings x 25 S$1.30 -26.5% 26.5%

Weighted Intrinsic Value Estimate: ~S$1.15 Current Margin of Safety: ~17%

This is below the 20% minimum threshold for a catalyst-driven investment and well below the 30% threshold for a no-catalyst investment.


PHASE 3: MOAT ANALYSIS

Moat Sources

1. Switching Costs (PRIMARY MOAT) -- NARROW

Once an organization implements an HRMS and loads employee data, payroll configurations, leave policies, and attendance rules, switching to a competitor is costly and disruptive. The prospectus explicitly states: "switching to a competitor becomes more costly and complex, and requires significant time spent on retraining." This is evidenced by:

  • 91% customer retention rate (improving annually)
  • Non-renewals primarily due to business closure, not competition
  • 25% of accounting software customers are also HRMS customers (cross-sell stickiness)

Measurement: Cost to Switch / Annual Customer Value = HIGH (an SME with 50 employees using 5 modules would spend 2-4 weeks migrating data, retraining staff, and verifying payroll accuracy -- this exceeds the annual subscription cost).

2. Regulatory Localization (SECONDARY MOAT) -- NARROW

Each country has unique payroll tax rules, labor regulations, and filing requirements. Info-Tech has built compliance engines for Singapore (CPF, IRAS AIS), Malaysia (EPF, SOCSO, EIS), Hong Kong (MPF), and India (PF, ESI). New entrants must replicate this compliance layer, which requires domain expertise and ongoing regulatory monitoring.

3. Brand & Reputation (WEAK MOAT)

Market leader in Singapore (9.8% share) and Malaysia for SME-focused cloud HRMS. Enterprise 50 Award winner. ISO 27001 and MTCS certified. But brand alone is not a durable moat in software.

Moat Durability Assessment

Threat Severity (1-5) Timeline Company Mitigation
AI-native HRMS disruption 4 3-5 years Launching Info-Tech AI, AI Talent Acquisition module
Global competitor (Zoho, Xero) pushes into SG/MY SME market 3 2-4 years Localization depth, customer support (4hr SLA)
Government grant withdrawal 3 1-3 years None disclosed; would need to adjust pricing
Price war from funded startup 3 2-3 years Customer retention stickiness, multi-product suite
Platform risk (Azure cost increase) 2 1-2 years Could potentially migrate; multi-region deployment

10-Year Moat Trajectory: STABLE to SLIGHTLY NARROWING

The switching cost moat is real but not wide -- it protects against casual churn but not against a vastly superior product. AI has the potential to fundamentally change HR software within 5-10 years. Info-Tech is investing in AI (Info-Tech AI chatbot, AI Talent Acquisition), but its R&D budget of S$3.7M is tiny compared to global competitors.


PHASE 4: MANAGEMENT & INCENTIVE ANALYSIS

Leadership Team

Name Role Age Background
Lee Kim Heng Peter Executive Chairman ~50s Co-founder, 25+ years in software solutions
Setin Subramanian Dilip Babu CEO & Executive Director ~50s Co-founder, 25+ years in software solutions
Yeoh Sin Yee Executive Director - Vendor (sold shares in IPO)

Insider Ownership (Post-IPO)

Mr. Lee Kim Heng Peter is the controlling shareholder with approximately 60.3% of shares post-offering. This is high insider ownership, which aligns interests with minority shareholders.

Compensation Analysis

The prospectus does not provide granular compensation details pre-IPO. Post-IPO, the company has established:

  • Info-Tech Systems Performance Share Plan (share awards)
  • Info-Tech Systems Employee Share Option Scheme (stock options)
  • Maximum dilution from these plans not to exceed 15% of issued share capital

Capital Allocation Track Record

Pre-IPO capital allocation was heavily influenced by the private company structure:

  • FY2022: S$7.8M in financing cash outflows (likely dividends/distributions to founders)
  • FY2023: S$1.1M in financing cash outflows
  • FY2024: S$3.3M in financing cash outflows (includes S$2.5M dividend declared April 2025)

Post-IPO Dividend Policy: Minimum 50% of net profit after tax for the period from Listing Date to 31 December 2025 and for FY2026. This implies ~S$6M+ in annual dividends, or ~S$0.023/share, or ~2.4% yield at current price.

Munger's Question

"If I were management with these incentives, what would I do?"

With 60% ownership and a freshly IPO'd company, the founder has strong incentive to grow the share price (his personal wealth is tied to it) while also extracting value through dividends and share sales. The IPO itself was partly a liquidity event (19.2M Vendor Shares sold). The lock-up period constrains near-term selling.

The risk is that the founder prioritizes revenue growth over profitability to justify the IPO multiple, potentially through acquisitions that may not create value. The company has explicitly stated interest in "inorganic acquisitions."


PHASE 5: CATALYST ANALYSIS (Klarman)

Potential Catalysts

Catalyst Type Timeline Probability Impact
Strong FY2025 results (first full year as public company) Internal Q1 2026 70% Moderate (+10-15%)
Accounting Software hits S$3M+ revenue Internal FY2025-26 60% Moderate
Academy expansion to Malaysia Internal FY2026 50% Small-Moderate
Jobs Lah monetization Internal FY2026-27 30% Moderate
CRM product launch Internal FY2026-27 40% Moderate
Strategic acquisition External FY2026-27 30% Variable
Inclusion in STI/MSCI Small Cap index External FY2027+ 20% Moderate
Johor-Singapore SEZ customer growth External FY2026-28 40% Small

No Catalyst Assessment

The near-term catalysts are primarily organic growth stories that are already somewhat priced in. There is no specific event (spin-off, activist, acquisition) that would trigger a sharp re-rating. This necessitates a larger margin of safety (30%+).


PHASE 6: DECISION SYNTHESIS

Megatrend Resilience Screen

Megatrend Score Notes
China Tech Superiority +1 Not directly affected; Singapore-focused
Europe Degrowth +1 No European exposure
American Protectionism +1 Not US-dependent
AI/Automation 0 Mixed: could benefit from AI integration or be disrupted
Demographics/Aging +1 HR software demand grows with labor complexity
Fiscal Crisis 0 Government grant dependency is a risk
Energy Transition +1 Asset-light, no energy intensity

Total: +5 | Tier 2 "Resilient"

Expected Return Scenarios

Scenario Probability 3-Year Price Return Weighted
Bull: 20% revenue CAGR, multiple expansion to 25x 20% S$1.65 +73% +14.6%
Base: 15% revenue CAGR, multiple holds at 20x 45% S$1.20 +26% +11.5%
Bear: 10% revenue growth, multiple contracts to 15x 25% S$0.78 -18% -4.6%
Disaster: Growth stalls, competitive loss 10% S$0.45 -53% -5.3%
Expected 3-Year Return 100% +16.2%

Expected 3-year return of ~16% (annualized ~5.1%) is below our 10% annual hurdle rate when adjusted for risk.

Position Sizing

Position Size = 3% x (17%/30%) x (75/100) x (1-0.3) x 0.7
             = 3% x 0.57 x 0.75 x 0.70 x 0.70
             = 0.63%

This is below the minimum meaningful position size (1.0%).


INVESTMENT RECOMMENDATION

+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                     INVESTMENT RECOMMENDATION                        |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Company: Info-Tech Systems Ltd.    Ticker: ITS (SGX)                |
| Current Price: S$0.955             Date: 22 February 2026           |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| VALUATION SUMMARY                                                    |
| +-------------------------+-----------+---------------------+        |
| | Method                  | Value/Shr | vs Current Price    |        |
| +-------------------------+-----------+---------------------+        |
| | DCF (Conservative)      | S$1.30    | 26.5% MOS           |        |
| | Private Market (6x Rev) | S$1.01    | -5.6% (overvalued)  |        |
| | Owner Earnings x 15     | S$0.78    | -22.4%              |        |
| | Owner Earnings x 20     | S$1.04    | 8.2% MOS            |        |
| | Owner Earnings x 25     | S$1.30    | 26.5% MOS           |        |
| +-------------------------+-----------+---------------------+        |
|                                                                      |
| INTRINSIC VALUE ESTIMATE: S$1.15 (weighted average)                 |
| MARGIN OF SAFETY: ~17% (INSUFFICIENT)                               |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| RECOMMENDATION:  [X] WAIT                                           |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| STRONG BUY PRICE:             S$0.69 (40% below IV)                |
| ACCUMULATE PRICE:             S$0.80 (30% below IV)                |
| FAIR VALUE:                   S$1.15                                |
| TAKE PROFITS PRICE:           S$1.38 (20% above IV)                |
| SELL PRICE:                   S$1.73 (50% above IV)                |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| POSITION SIZE: 0% (WAIT for better entry)                           |
| CATALYST: None identified with sufficient probability               |
| PRIMARY RISK: AI disruption to HRMS market / valuation compression  |
| SELL TRIGGER: Revenue growth < 8% for 2 consecutive quarters        |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+

Verdict

WAIT. Info-Tech Systems is a genuinely good business with excellent SaaS economics, strong market positioning in Singapore/Malaysia, improving customer retention, and multiple growth vectors. This is the kind of business Buffett would approve of qualitatively -- recurring revenue, high margins, switching costs, asset-light.

However, the current valuation of ~20x trailing earnings provides insufficient margin of safety. The business is small (S$44M revenue), operates in a competitive market with low barriers to AI-driven disruption, and faces potential government grant dependency. The IPO was priced to extract value for the founders, not to create bargains for new investors.

Wait for S$0.80 or below (a decline of ~16% from current levels). This could occur during:

  • A broader SGX selloff
  • Lock-up period expiry (if founders sell more shares)
  • A disappointing quarterly result (the first few as a public company)
  • A tech correction or rotation out of small-cap SaaS names

At S$0.80, the margin of safety would expand to ~30%, making this an ACCUMULATE with a 2% position.

Monitoring Metrics

Metric Current Threshold Action if Breached
Customer Retention Rate 91% <85% Reassess thesis
Revenue Growth (YoY) 14.8% <8% for 2 qtrs Reassess thesis
HRMS Customer Count Growth 15.2% <10% Monitor closely
Net Margin 28.2% <20% Investigate cause
Insider Selling Lock-up period Material sales >5% Reassess

SOURCES USED

Primary Documents

Document Source Local Path
Prospectus (27 Jun 2025) SGX/MAS research/analyses/ITS/data/prospectus-2025.pdf
Product Highlights Sheet SGX research/analyses/ITS/data/product-highlights-sheet.pdf
Extracted text files (6) Prospectus extraction research/analyses/ITS/data/*.txt

Market Data

Source Key Data
StockAnalysis.com Current price S$0.955, P/E 19.85, Market Cap S$247M
Info-Tech IR website IPO oversubscription data (14.4x public, 5.5x placement)
SGX announcements Listing date 4 July 2025

Independent Market Research

  • Converging Knowledge Pte Ltd (commissioned by Info-Tech for prospectus): SME cloud-based HR/accounting software market data for Singapore, Malaysia, Hong Kong, India
  • Combined SME market size: US$3.3B (2024), TAM: US$17.3B
  • Market CAGR: 7.2% to 11.9% (2025-2029)