Back to Portfolio
LISN

Lindt & SprΓΌngli

Under Review
B T1
Key Risk

Valuation never normalizes (opportunity cost)

Lindt is a wonderful company at a wonderful price - for existing shareholders. At P/E 47x, new buyers are paying for 10+ years of perfect execution with no room for error. The cocoa crisis has structu...

47x P/E
15.76% ROE
6% FCF
NARROW MOAT
Catalyst

ANALYSIS

OppRiskFinMoatMgmtCat 5/6

Executive Summary

Metric Value Assessment
Thesis Premium chocolate brand with pricing power STRONG
Moat Brand + Pricing Power + Vertical Integration WIDE (Morningstar)
Quality ROE 15.76%, FCF margin 11.6% PASSES BUFFETT TEST
Valuation P/E 47x vs historical 39x EXPENSIVE
Risk Cocoa crisis, valuation MODERATE
Recommendation WAIT - Great business, wrong price See details below

Investment Thesis in 3 Sentences: Lindt & SprΓΌngli is the global leader in premium chocolate with 40% market share, 175+ years of brand heritage, and demonstrated pricing power (100% premium over mass-market in US). The company passes every Buffett quality test: ROE 15.76%, conservative balance sheet (D/E 0.24x), 29 consecutive dividend increases, and vertically integrated operations. However, at P/E 47x, the stock offers no margin of safety - this is a WAIT for a better entry price.


PRE-ANALYSIS: SCREENING

Munger Anti-Checklist

Criterion Status Notes
Outside circle of competence βœ“ Clear Chocolate is simple
Heavily promoted by Wall Street βœ“ Clear Boring Swiss company
Requires macro forecast βœ“ Clear Chocolate demand stable
Management with questionable character βœ“ Clear Family stewardship, conservative
Complex capital structure βœ“ Clear Simple equity structure
Dependent on single product ⚠️ CAUTION Chocolate only, but diversified brands
Requires technology prediction βœ“ Clear No tech disruption risk
Buying because price dropped βœ“ Clear Price near highs
Social proof trap βœ“ Clear Not widely discussed
Story > numbers βœ“ Clear Numbers are excellent
Can't identify opportunity βœ“ IDENTIFIED Valuation is the constraint

Anti-Checklist Score: 1 minor caution flag - PASSES

Graham's 7 Criteria

# Criterion Test Result
1 Adequate Size Revenue CHF 5.47B βœ“ PASS
2 Strong Financial Condition D/E 0.24x, Equity ratio 52.8% βœ“ PASS
3 Earnings Stability 10+ years positive, growing βœ“ PASS
4 Dividend Record 29 consecutive increases βœ“ PASS
5 Earnings Growth 7.8% organic growth 2024 βœ“ PASS
6 Moderate P/E P/E 47x βœ— FAIL
7 Moderate P/B P/B ~7x βœ— FAIL

Graham Score: 5/7 - Fails valuation criteria (quality business, expensive price)

Buffett Quality Criteria - PASSES

Criterion Assessment Pass?
Can I explain in one sentence? "Premium Swiss chocolate sold at 2x mass-market prices" βœ“ PASS
ROE consistently > 15%? 15.76% βœ“ PASS
Management skin in game Family foundation, long-term focus βœ“ PASS
Identifiable moat Brand, pricing power, vertical integration βœ“ PASS
Consistent FCF CHF 635M (11.6% margin) βœ“ PASS

CRITICAL FINDING: ROE of 15.76% PASSES the Buffett threshold. This is a quality business. The issue is price, not quality.


PHASE 0: OPPORTUNITY IDENTIFICATION

Why Does This Opportunity Exist?

Opportunity Source Present? Evidence
Forced selling No No structural selling pressure
Complexity discount No Simple business
Institutional constraints No Well-covered, liquid
Temporary operational problem Partial Cocoa crisis creates margin pressure
Market overreaction No Stock near 52-week highs
Neglect No 14 analysts cover

Assessment: There is no clear mispricing opportunity. The market correctly recognizes Lindt as a high-quality business and prices it accordingly. The "opportunity" would require waiting for:

  1. A market correction that drags down all stocks
  2. Cocoa crisis worsening beyond expectations
  3. Multiple compression from current 47x to a more reasonable level

PHASE 1: RISK ANALYSIS (Inversion)

"How could this investment lose 50%+ permanently?"

  1. Cocoa supply collapse: If the cocoa crisis (disease in West Africa, climate change) becomes permanent, input costs could structurally impair margins. Lindt's CEO said prices "will never come down to previous levels."

  2. Brand erosion: If quality slips, or if private label/artisanal competitors capture the "premium" positioning, Lindt's pricing power could erode. This would take decades given 175 years of brand building.

  3. Valuation compression: At P/E 47x, if the market re-rates Lindt to a "normal" consumer staples multiple of 20-25x, the stock could fall 40-50% even with no business deterioration.

  4. GLP-1 obesity drugs impact: If Ozempic/Wegovy significantly reduce chocolate consumption, the entire confectionery industry could face structural demand decline.

What Would Make Me Sell Immediately?

  1. Gross margin falling below 55% (currently 65%)
  2. Market share loss in premium segment below 30%
  3. Management making large, value-destroying acquisitions
  4. Brand scandal affecting consumer trust
  5. ROE declining below 12%

Bear Case in 3 Sentences

"Lindt is a wonderful company at a wonderful price - for existing shareholders. At P/E 47x, new buyers are paying for 10+ years of perfect execution with no room for error. The cocoa crisis has structurally raised input costs, and GLP-1 drugs could dampen chocolate demand, yet the stock trades near all-time highs."

Can I state this bear case better than the bears? Yes, but the bear case is fundamentally about valuation, not business quality. The business is excellent.

Risk Quantification

Risk Probability Impact Expected Loss
Cocoa cost absorption 40% -15% -6.0%
Valuation compression 30% -30% -9.0%
GLP-1 demand impact 15% -20% -3.0%
Competitive erosion 10% -25% -2.5%
Aggregate Downside - - -20.5%

PHASE 2: FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

2024 Results

Metric 2024 2023 Change
Revenue CHF 5.47B CHF 5.21B +5.1%
Organic Growth 7.8% 10.3% -250bps
EBIT CHF 884M CHF 813M +8.7%
EBIT Margin 16.2% 15.6% +60bps
Net Income CHF 672M CHF 671M +0.1%
EPS CHF 2,917 CHF 2,889 +1.0%
Free Cash Flow CHF 635M - Strong
FCF Margin 11.6% - Excellent

Analysis: Revenue growing organically at 7.8% despite cocoa headwinds. EBIT margin expanding despite input cost pressure - demonstrates pricing power. FCF margin of 11.6% is excellent for a consumer staples company.

Return Metrics - PASSES BUFFETT TEST

Metric 2024 5-yr Avg 15-yr Avg Buffett Min
ROE 15.76% ~15% ~15% 15% βœ“
ROIC 9-10% 10.9% 11.8% >WACC
WACC ~6% ~6% ~6% -
ROIC - WACC +3-4% +5% +6% >0% βœ“

Key Insight: ROE has been stable around 15-16% for 15+ years. The business consistently earns above its cost of capital. This is exactly what Buffett looks for.

Balance Sheet - Fortress

Metric Value Assessment
Equity Ratio 52.8% Strong
Debt/Equity 0.24x Very Conservative
Net Debt/EBITDA <0.5x Minimal leverage
Cash Position Ample Strong liquidity

Comparison to Peers:

  • Hershey D/E: 3.0x
  • MondelΔ“z D/E: 0.7x
  • Lindt D/E: 0.24x

Lindt's conservative balance sheet is a competitive advantage - allows opportunistic M&A during crises and dividend stability.

Dividend Track Record

Metric Value
Consecutive Increases 29 years
2024 Dividend CHF 1,500/share
YoY Increase +7.1%
Payout Ratio ~50%
Yield ~1.3%

PHASE 3: MOAT ANALYSIS

Morningstar Wide Moat Rating - Confirmed

Lindt holds a Wide Moat rating from Morningstar, supported by:

Moat Source Strength Evidence
Brand Intangible STRONG 175+ year heritage, "Swiss luxury" positioning
Pricing Power STRONG 100% premium vs mass-market (US), 25% (Europe)
Vertical Integration STRONG Proprietary manufacturing, supply chain control
Multi-Brand Portfolio STRONG Lindt, Ghirardelli, Russell Stover, Caffarel
Distribution Control MODERATE 500+ own stores, e-commerce growth

Market Position

Metric Value Competitive Context
Premium Chocolate Share 40% #1 globally
US Premium Share 29.4% #1 in $18B market
Global Premium Value Share 18.2% Dominant position
Gross Margin 65% Indicates pricing power

Moat Durability Test

Threat Severity Timeline Company Response
Cocoa cost inflation 3/5 Ongoing Price increases passed to consumers
Private label premium 2/5 5+ years Brand loyalty, quality gap
Artisanal competitors 2/5 Ongoing Different market segment
GLP-1 demand impact 2/5 10+ years Portfolio diversification, smaller formats
E-commerce disruption 2/5 Ongoing 500+ own stores, online growth

Key Question: "Will this moat be wider or narrower in 10 years?"

Answer: STABLE TO WIDER

  • Brand heritage compounds with time (175 years β†’ 185 years)
  • Vertical integration insulates from supply shocks better than competitors
  • Premium segment growing faster than mass-market (6.8% CAGR)
  • Cocoa crisis may consolidate industry (weak players exit)

Moat Assessment: WIDE - Full Position Eligible (at right price)


PHASE 4: MANAGEMENT & CAPITAL ALLOCATION

Ownership & Governance

Factor Assessment
Family Foundation Control Onex-Chocoladefabriken, long-term orientation
Management Tenure CEO since 2015, deep experience
Compensation Moderate by Swiss standards
Capital Allocation Conservative, quality-focused

Capital Allocation Track Record

Use of FCF % Quality Assessment
Dividends ~40% 29 consecutive increases - excellent
Buybacks ~20% Opportunistic, below intrinsic value
M&A ~20% Selective (Russell Stover, Caffarel)
Organic Investment ~20% Capacity, stores, R&D

Assessment: Textbook Buffett capital allocation. Returns cash to shareholders, makes selective acquisitions, invests in the business. No empire-building.

2025 Guidance

Metric 2025 Outlook
Organic Growth 7-9%
EBIT Margin Expansion +20-40 bps
Cocoa Strategy Price increases, hedging

PHASE 5: CATALYST ANALYSIS

Potential Catalysts

Catalyst Probability Timeline Impact
Cocoa prices normalize 40% 2025-2026 +15%
Market correction 30% Unknown Entry opportunity
Competitor distress (Hershey, MondelΔ“z) 20% 2025 Market share gain
Multiple expansion 10% Unknown +20%

Catalyst Assessment: WEAK

There is no near-term catalyst to unlock value. The stock is already fully valued by the market. The "catalyst" is patience - waiting for either:

  1. Price to come down (valuation compression)
  2. Earnings to grow into the valuation (time arbitrage)

Without catalyst, require 30%+ margin of safety = CHF 71,400 entry price


PHASE 6: MEGATREND RESILIENCE

Megatrend Score Rationale
China Tech Superiority +1 No exposure, potential growth market
Europe Degrowth 0 European HQ, but global diversification
American Protectionism 0 US manufacturing (Ghirardelli, Russell Stover)
AI/Automation +1 Manufacturing automation benefits
Demographics/Aging 0 Neutral - chocolate consumption stable
Fiscal Crisis +1 Affordable luxury, resilient demand
Energy Transition 0 Low energy intensity
Total +3

Tier Assignment: T1 "Fortress" - Total β‰₯ +3, no score below 0

Megatrend Conclusion: Resilient to all major megatrends. "Affordable luxury" positioning protects during downturns (trade-down from expensive luxuries, trade-up from mass-market).


PHASE 7: VALUATION

Current Valuation Metrics

Metric Current 5-yr Avg Assessment
P/E (TTM) 47x 39x 20% premium
P/E (2026E) 36x 39x Reasonable forward
EV/EBITDA ~25x ~22x Premium
Price/Sales ~5x ~4.5x Premium
Dividend Yield 1.3% 1.5% Slightly low

Valuation Trinity

1. Liquidation Value (Floor)

Not meaningful for brand-based business. Lindt's value is in its brand, not tangible assets.

2. DCF Valuation (Conservative)

Assumptions:

  • 2024 Owner Earnings: ~CHF 550M (FCF adjusted)
  • Growth Years 1-5: 6% (below guidance of 7-9%)
  • Growth Years 6-10: 4%
  • Terminal Growth: 2.5%
  • Discount Rate: 8%
Scenario Growth Intrinsic Value/Share vs CHF 117,000
Bear 3% CHF 85,000 -27% overvalued
Base 5% CHF 102,000 -13% overvalued
Bull 7% CHF 130,000 +11% undervalued

DCF Conclusion: Base case fair value ~CHF 102,000. Current price of CHF 117,000 offers no margin of safety.

3. Earnings Multiple Valuation

Scenario EPS Multiple Value vs Current
Conservative CHF 2,917 30x CHF 87,500 -25%
Normal CHF 2,917 35x CHF 102,100 -13%
Premium CHF 2,917 40x CHF 116,700 0%
Current CHF 2,917 40x CHF 117,000 0%

Multiple Conclusion: Market is pricing Lindt at the high end of its historical range. Fair value on normalized multiple (35x for quality) = CHF 102,000.

Margin of Safety Summary

Method Value Current MOS
DCF (Base) CHF 102,000 CHF 117,000 -15% (overvalued)
Multiple (35x) CHF 102,000 CHF 117,000 -15% (overvalued)
Analyst Consensus CHF 121,000 CHF 117,000 +3%
BofA Target CHF 144,000 CHF 117,000 +23%

MOS Conclusion: The stock is 15% overvalued on conservative assumptions. Need 30% MOS = CHF 71,400 entry price.


PHASE 8: DECISION SYNTHESIS

Psychology Check

Bias Present? Mitigation
Story > Numbers RISK - "Swiss chocolate heritage" Focus on valuation math
Excessive self-regard No Bear case is clear (valuation)
Authority misinfluence RISK - "Morningstar Wide Moat" Moat is real, but price matters
Liking tendency RISK - Lindt is a beloved brand Would I buy any stock at 47x P/E?

Final Munger Tests

  1. Can I explain to a 12-year-old? Yes. "Lindt makes fancy chocolate that people pay twice as much for because it's better and feels special."

  2. What do I believe that market doesn't? Nothing. The market correctly values Lindt as a high-quality business. There's no variant perception here.

  3. If wrong about one thing, what kills thesis? If valuation never normalizes (stock stays at 40-50x forever), I'll never get an entry. Opportunity cost.

  4. If stock dropped 50%, would I buy more? YES, absolutely. At CHF 58,500, this would be a screaming buy. That's the difference between REJECTED and WAIT.

Expected Return Scenarios

Scenario Probability Return Weighted
Bull (Growth + expansion) 15% +40% +6.0%
Base (Grow into valuation) 50% +5%/yr +2.5%/yr
Bear (Multiple compression) 30% -25% -7.5%
Disaster (Thesis break) 5% -50% -2.5%
Expected 1-Year Return 100% -1.5%
Expected 5-Year CAGR ~5%

At current price, expected returns are below hurdle rate. WAIT for better entry.


FINAL RECOMMENDATION

β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
β”‚                     INVESTMENT RECOMMENDATION                    β”‚
β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€
β”‚ Company: Lindt & SprΓΌngli          Ticker: LISN.SW              β”‚
β”‚ Current Price: CHF 117,000         Date: December 2024          β”‚
β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€
β”‚ VALUATION SUMMARY                                                β”‚
β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ Method                  β”‚ Value/Share β”‚ vs Current Price    β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”Όβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”Όβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ DCF (Conservative)      β”‚ CHF 102,000 β”‚ -13% (overvalued)   β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ Multiple (35x normal)   β”‚ CHF 102,000 β”‚ -13% (overvalued)   β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ Analyst Consensus       β”‚ CHF 121,000 β”‚ +3% MOS             β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ BofA Target             β”‚ CHF 144,000 β”‚ +23% MOS            β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚
β”‚                                                                  β”‚
β”‚ INTRINSIC VALUE ESTIMATE: CHF 102,000 (conservative)            β”‚
β”‚ MARGIN OF SAFETY: -15% (OVERVALUED)                             β”‚
β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€
β”‚ RECOMMENDATION:  [ ] BUY  [ ] HOLD  [ ] SELL  [X] WAIT          β”‚
β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€
β”‚ QUALITY ASSESSMENT: EXCELLENT - Passes all Buffett tests       β”‚
β”‚ VALUATION ASSESSMENT: EXPENSIVE - No margin of safety          β”‚
β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€
β”‚ TARGET ENTRY PRICES:                                             β”‚
β”‚ STRONG BUY:              CHF 71,400  (30% below IV)             β”‚
β”‚ ACCUMULATE:              CHF 81,600  (20% below IV)             β”‚
β”‚ FAIR VALUE:              CHF 102,000                            β”‚
β”‚ TAKE PROFITS:            CHF 122,400 (20% above IV)             β”‚
β”‚ SELL:                    CHF 153,000 (50% above IV)             β”‚
β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€
β”‚ POSITION SIZE (at entry): 4-5% of portfolio (full position)    β”‚
β”‚ CATALYST: None required - quality justifies patience            β”‚
β”‚ PRIMARY RISK: Valuation never normalizes (opportunity cost)     β”‚
β”‚ SELL TRIGGER: Gross margin <55%, ROE <12%, brand scandal        β”‚
β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜

"Too Hard" Pile Assessment

Factor Assessment
Can explain in one sentence? YES - Premium chocolate
Predictable business? YES - 175 years of consistency
Understand competitive dynamics? YES - Brand-based moat
Governance clear? YES - Swiss, family-oriented

TOO HARD PILE VERDICT: NO - This is a simple, high-quality business

Final Decision

WAIT

Criterion Requirement Lindt Pass?
ROE > 15% Mandatory 15.76% βœ“ PASS
Wide Moat Identifiable Morningstar confirmed βœ“ PASS
Simple Business Explainable Premium chocolate βœ“ PASS
Conservative BS D/E < 1.0 0.24x βœ“ PASS
MOS > 20% With catalyst -15% βœ— FAIL
MOS > 30% Without catalyst -15% βœ— FAIL

Business Quality: A+ Valuation: D (too expensive) Decision: WAIT for CHF 81,600 or better


Price Alerts to Set

Level Price Action
Strong Buy CHF 71,400 Full position (4-5%)
Accumulate CHF 81,600 Start position (2-3%)
Watch CHF 95,000 Reassess valuation

What Would Change My Mind

To BUY now:

  1. Major market correction (20%+ general decline) dragging Lindt down
  2. Cocoa crisis intensifying beyond current expectations (temporary headwind)
  3. Company-specific bad news that doesn't impair the moat

To REJECT:

  1. ROE declining below 12% structurally
  2. Gross margin compression below 55%
  3. Material market share loss to competitors
  4. Management change with poor capital allocation

Ensemble Validation Prompt

Analyze Lindt & SprΓΌngli (LISN.SW) using value investing principles:

Key Data:
- Price: CHF 117,000, Market Cap: CHF 28B
- Revenue: CHF 5.47B (+7.8% organic), EBIT margin: 16.2%
- ROE: 15.76%, ROIC: ~10%, D/E: 0.24x
- P/E: 47x TTM, 36x 2026E (historical avg: 39x)
- Premium chocolate market share: 40% global, 29% US
- Morningstar Wide Moat rating
- 29 consecutive dividend increases
- Cocoa prices: +177% in 2024 (crisis conditions)

Questions:
1. Does the ROE of 15.76% justify calling this a "quality" business?
2. Is P/E 47x justified for this level of quality and growth (7-9%)?
3. What entry price would provide adequate margin of safety?
4. Is the cocoa crisis a temporary headwind or structural risk?
5. How does GLP-1 drug adoption affect long-term chocolate demand?

Be rigorous. This is a great business - the question is whether it's a great investment at this price.

Sources


Analysis completed December 2024 Primary Analyst: Claude Opus 4.5 (Claude Code) Status: WAIT - Great business, wrong price