Waste Management Inc

Executive Summary

Investment Thesis (3 sentences): Waste Management is North America's dominant waste services provider with unmatched scale (262 landfills, 339 transfer stations), creating a near-permanent geographic moat in a recession-resistant, essential services industry. The company generates exceptional returns on equity (29-33%), has increased dividends for 22 consecutive years, and benefits from secular tailwinds in sustainability/recycling while facing no credible competitive threat to its core disposal business. However, the stock trades at premium valuations (P/E 35x, EV/EBITDA 15x) following a 120% 5-year return, limiting near-term upside absent a market correction.

Verdict: WAIT

---

Phase 1: Risk Analysis (Inversion)

"What could destroy this investment?"

1. Technological Disruption Risk

Question: Could waste-to-value technologies eliminate the need for landfills?

Assessment: LOW-MEDIUM (P=15%, Impact=High)

• Advanced recycling/pyrolysis: Could theoretically convert waste plastics to fuel. However, economics remain challenging vs. virgin materials.
• Composting mandates: Organic waste diversion growing but WM is a leader in organics processing (49 facilities).
• Circular economy: Increasing producer responsibility laws could reduce waste volumes, but WM is positioned as a recycling leader (105 recycling facilities).

Key Insight: WM is the aggressor, not the victim. They're investing heavily in recycling automation, renewable energy (102 landfill gas projects), and emerging technologies. The 2024 Stericycle acquisition ($7.2B) adds medical waste handling - a growing segment with regulatory barriers.

Risk Score: 3/10

2. Regulatory/Environmental Risk

Question: Could environmental regulations make operations unviable?

Assessment: MEDIUM (P=20%, Impact=Medium)

• PFAS liability: "Forever chemicals" in landfill leachate is an emerging issue. WM has reserves but exact exposure is uncertain.
• Carbon regulations: Landfill methane emissions face increasing scrutiny. WM's gas capture (102 projects) is a mitigant.
• Permitting difficulties: Land scarcity and NIMBYism make new landfill permits extremely rare - this is a MOAT, not a risk.
• Climate adaptation: Extreme weather can increase costs but also drives revenue from cleanup.

Key Insight: Regulatory complexity is WM's friend. Every new regulation increases barriers to entry and pushes smaller competitors out.

Risk Score: 4/10

3. Competitive Risk

Question: Could competitors erode WM's market position?

Assessment: LOW (P=10%, Impact=Medium)

• Direct competition: Republic Services (RSG) is the only national competitor. Industry is essentially a duopoly.
• Pricing power: WM consistently achieves 4-6% annual price increases (core price).
• Municipal insourcing: Some cities operate their own services, but the trend is toward privatization due to complexity.
• New entrants: Impossible in disposal (no new landfills permitted in major markets). Collection is local and fragmented - WM acquires competitors.

Risk Score: 2/10

4. Financial/Capital Allocation Risk

Question: Could over-leverage or poor capital allocation impair returns?

Assessment: MEDIUM (P=25%, Impact=Medium)

• Stericycle integration: $7.2B acquisition (Nov 2024) increased debt significantly. Debt/EBITDA now ~3.5x vs. historical 2.5-2.8x.
• Synergy realization: Management targets $250M+ synergies within 2-3 years. Execution risk exists.
• Share buybacks paused: Repurchases suspended for ~18 months post-acquisition, reducing capital return.
• Interest rate exposure: ~$22B long-term debt; rising rates increase costs.

Mitigants:

• Management has strong track record (Advanced Disposal acquisition successful)
• Dividend maintained and increased 10% (now $3.30/year)
• FCF generation strong ($2.2B+/year)

Risk Score: 5/10

5. Management Risk

Question: Is management aligned with shareholders?

Assessment: LOW (P=5%, Impact=High)

• CEO Jim Fish: 9 years as CEO, previously CFO. Insider ownership meaningful.
• Board composition: 8 of 9 directors independent. Non-executive chair structure.
• Capital allocation: Disciplined M&A, consistent dividend growth (22 years), share repurchases when accretive.
• Compensation: Tied to operating cash flow, ROIC, and safety metrics.

Risk Score: 2/10

Risk Register Summary

Aggregate Risk Score: 16/50 (Low-Moderate)

---

Phase 2: Financial Analysis

Historical Performance (5-Year)

Profitability Analysis

DuPont Analysis (2024):

• ROE = Net Margin x Asset Turnover x Equity Multiplier
• 32.5% = 12.4% x 0.50 x 5.4

The high ROE is driven by:

1. Industry-leading margins (disposal pricing power)
2. Moderate asset turnover (capital-intensive business)
3. Significant leverage (debt-financed landfill assets)

Capital Structure

Note: Debt increase from Stericycle acquisition. Management targets leverage reduction to 2.5-3.0x within 18 months.

Owner Earnings Calculation (2024)

Net Income                     $2,700M
+ Depreciation/Amortization    $2,300M
- Maintenance CapEx            $1,800M  (estimated at 55% of total CapEx)
- Change in Working Capital       $50M
= Owner Earnings               $3,150M
Per Share                        $7.83

Owner Earnings Yield: 3.5% at $221 (acceptable but not compelling)

Valuation Analysis

DCF Model (10-Year)

Assumptions:

• Revenue growth: 6% Years 1-3 (Stericycle synergies), 4% Years 4-7, 3% thereafter
• Operating margin: Expand from 17% to 19% by Year 5 (synergies)
• CapEx: 14% of revenue
• WACC: 7.5% (low beta = 0.59)
• Terminal growth: 2.5%

Relative Valuation

Conclusion: WM trades at a 15-20% premium to peers and the industry. This premium is partially justified by superior scale and execution, but current valuations leave limited margin of safety.

---

Phase 3: Moat Analysis

Moat Sources Identified

1. Network Effect / Local Scale (WIDE MOAT)

Description: Waste collection is hyperlocal. WM's density of trucks, transfer stations, and disposal sites in each market creates unmatched cost efficiency.

Evidence:

• 262 landfills (largest in N.A., 2x nearest competitor)
• 339 transfer stations
• 61,700 employees
• Route density drives cost advantage: more customers per route = lower cost per pickup

Measurability:

• Internalization rate: ~68% of collected waste goes to WM-owned disposal (industry benchmark: 50%)
• This internalization captures ~$15-20/ton additional margin vs. third-party disposal

Duration: Permanent. Landfills cannot be replicated (permitting takes 7-10 years, massive capital requirements, intense community opposition).

Moat Score: 9/10

2. Regulatory Barrier (WIDE MOAT)

Description: Operating permits for landfills, transfer stations, and treatment facilities are extraordinarily difficult to obtain.

Evidence:

• No new large landfills permitted in major U.S. metros in 20+ years
• Environmental regulations create compliance costs that favor scale
• Stericycle acquisition adds regulated medical waste (more complex permitting)

Measurability:

• Replacement cost of WM's permitted landfill capacity: Incalculable (effectively impossible)
• Years to permit new landfill: 7-10+ years with high failure rate

Duration: Permanent, likely strengthening as environmental scrutiny increases.

Moat Score: 10/10

3. Switching Costs (MODERATE MOAT)

Description: Commercial and municipal customers face significant costs to switch providers.

Evidence:

• Multi-year contracts (3-10 years for municipalities)
• Container equipment specific to WM trucks
• Billing integration, compliance reporting
• Relationship continuity (reliability critical for business operations)

Measurability:

• Customer retention rate: ~90%+ for commercial accounts
• Average commercial contract length: 3 years with auto-renewal

Duration: Persistent but not absolute (customers can switch at contract renewal).

Moat Score: 6/10

4. Cost Advantage (WIDE MOAT)

Description: Scale enables lower unit costs across all operations.

Evidence:

• Procurement leverage: Largest buyer of trucks, containers, equipment
• Fuel hedging at scale (significant CNG fleet)
• Technology investment: Automated trucks, AI-driven routing, sorting robotics
• Shared services: Corporate overhead spread over $22B revenue base

Measurability:

• Operating margin: 17% vs. industry 14%
• G&A as % of revenue: ~10% vs. smaller competitors ~15%

Duration: Persistent and widening as automation investments compound.

Moat Score: 8/10

Moat Durability Test

Question: What could erode WM's competitive advantages in 10 years?

Overall Moat Assessment: WIDE (8.5/10)

WM possesses one of the strongest moats in the industrial sector, combining multiple reinforcing advantages. The key moat (landfill ownership + permits) is effectively permanent.

---

Phase 4: Decision Synthesis

Position Sizing Framework

Using the Kelly Criterion modified for value investing:

Expected Return = P(success) x Upside + P(failure) x Downside
               = 70% x 15% + 30% x -20%
               = 10.5% - 6% = 4.5%

Kelly % = Edge / Odds = 4.5% / 20% = 22.5%
Half-Kelly (conservative) = 11.25%

Recommended Position Size: 3-6% of portfolio at current prices (reduced from normal due to stretched valuations).

At Strong Buy price (<$195): Increase to 6-10% position.

Expected Return Distribution

Expected 3-Year Return: 14% (4.5% CAGR) + 1.5% dividend = 6% annualized

This is below our target return hurdle of 10%+ for new positions at current prices.

Monitoring Metrics & Triggers

Catalyst Calendar

---

Investment Decision

Summary

Verdict: WAIT

Waste Management is a high-quality compounder with an exceptional moat, but current valuations (P/E 35x, EV/EBITDA 15x) fully reflect the company's strengths. The stock has delivered 120% total return over 5 years and trades near all-time highs.

Recommended Actions:

1. Do not initiate a new position at $221+ - Expected returns (6% annualized) are below our 10% hurdle.

2. Strong Buy below $195 (12% margin of safety):

   • Would represent P/E ~29x on 2025E earnings
   • EV/EBITDA ~13x
   • Dividend yield ~1.7%
   • Expected return improves to 10%+ annualized

3. Accumulate below $210:

   • Modest discount to fair value
   • Acceptable entry for long-term holders

4. If currently owned: HOLD - excellent compounder, no reason to sell quality at fair value.

For Dividend Investors

WM is attractive for income-focused investors despite low current yield:

• 22 consecutive years of dividend increases
• 10% increase announced for 2025 ($0.825/quarter = $3.30/year)
• Payout ratio ~45% leaves room for growth
• Yield on cost compounds significantly over time

At $195, yield would be 1.7% with potential for 8-10% annual dividend growth.

---

Sources

• WM Annual Reports 2020-2024 (PDF)
• SEC Form 10-K FY2024
• EODHD Historical Price Data (Dec 2019 - Dec 2025)
• stockanalysis.com financial data
• Analyst reports: Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, Oppenheimer, BMO Capital

---

Analysis prepared using Warren Buffett value investing methodology with quantitative validation.

Last updated: December 25, 2025